Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34765884›Full record

ArticleSocio-ecological practice research2020

The COVID-19 pandemic: local to global implications as perceived by urban ecologists.

Ian Douglas, Mark Champion, Joy Clancy, David Haley, Marcelo Lopes de Souza, Kerry Morrison, Alan Scott, Richard Scott, Miriam Stark, Joanne Tippett and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Socio-ecological practice research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Variation in predicted COVID-19 risk among lemurs and lorises.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Ian DouglasSchool of Environment, Education and Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2451-8133
Mark ChampionLancashire Wildlife Trust, The Barn, Berkley Drive, Preston, PR5 6BY UK.
Joy ClancyUniversity of Twente, Enschede Area, The Netherlands.
David HaleyZhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, China.
Marcelo Lopes de SouzaDepartment of Geography, University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Kerry Morrisonin-situ, Nelson, Lancashire, UK.
Alan ScottComplete Ecology Limited, 76 Tankerville Road, Streatham, London, SW16 5LP UK.
Richard ScottDirector of the National Wildflower Centre, Eden Project, Bodelva, Cornwall PL24 2SG UK.
Miriam StarkDepartment of Anthropology, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Saunders 346, 2424 Maile Way, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA.
Joanne TippettSchool of Environment Education and Development, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL UK.
Piotr TryjanowskiInstitute of Zoology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71 C, 60-625 Poznań, Poland.
Tim WebbLondon National Park City, London, UK.
University of Manchester · GBChatham House · GBEden Project · GBUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Life Sciences in Poznań · PLUniversity of Twente · NLVincent Wildlife Trust · GBZhongyuan University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global COVID-19 pandemic is affecting everyone, but in many different ways, stimulating contrasting reactions and responses: opportunities for some, difficulties for many. A simple survey of how individual workers in urban ecology have been coping with COVID-19 constraints found divergent responses to COVID-19 on people's activities, both within countries and between continents. Many academics felt frustrated at being unable to do fieldwork, but several saw opportunities to change ways of working and review their engagement with the natural world. Some engaging with social groups found new ways of sharing ideas and developing aspirations without face-to-face contact. Practitioners creating and managing urban greenspaces had to devise ways to work and travel while maintaining social distancing. Many feared severe funding impacts from changed local government priorities. Around the world, the COVID-19 pandemic has amplified issues, such as environmental injustice, disaster preparation and food security, that have been endemic in most countries across the global south in modern times. However, developing and sustaining the strong community spirit shown in many places will speed economic recovery and make cities more resilient against future geophysical and people-made disasters. Significantly, top-down responses and one-size-fits-all solutions, however good the modelling on which they are based, are unlikely to succeed without the insights that local knowledge and community understanding can bring. We all will have to look at disaster preparation in a more comprehensive, caring and consistent way in future.

Indexed as

COVID-19Environmental justiceFieldworkFundingGlobal southLocal knowledgeUrban ecology

Identifiers

PMID34765884
PMCPMC7484922
OpenAlexW3085105988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.