Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34765697›Full record

ArticleTobacco regulatory science2019

How and Why Consumers View "Little Cigars" as Legally-Defined Cigarettes.

Eric N Lindblom, Andrea C Johnson, Tiffany Gray, George Luta, Darren Mays

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco regulatory science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. What Do Adolescents and Young Adults Think a Cigarillo Is? Implications for Health Communication.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric N LindblomEric N. Lindblom, Program Director, O'Neill Institute for National & Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC. Andrea C. Johnson, Doctoral Student, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC. Tiffany Gray, Doctoral Student, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC. George Luta, Associate Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. Darren Mays, Associate Professor, Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Andrea C JohnsonEric N. Lindblom, Program Director, O'Neill Institute for National & Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC. Andrea C. Johnson, Doctoral Student, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC. Tiffany Gray, Doctoral Student, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC. George Luta, Associate Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. Darren Mays, Associate Professor, Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Tiffany GrayEric N. Lindblom, Program Director, O'Neill Institute for National & Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC. Andrea C. Johnson, Doctoral Student, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC. Tiffany Gray, Doctoral Student, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC. George Luta, Associate Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. Darren Mays, Associate Professor, Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
George LutaEric N. Lindblom, Program Director, O'Neill Institute for National & Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC. Andrea C. Johnson, Doctoral Student, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC. Tiffany Gray, Doctoral Student, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC. George Luta, Associate Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. Darren Mays, Associate Professor, Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Darren MaysEric N. Lindblom, Program Director, O'Neill Institute for National & Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC. Andrea C. Johnson, Doctoral Student, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC. Tiffany Gray, Doctoral Student, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC. George Luta, Associate Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. Darren Mays, Associate Professor, Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Milken Institute · US

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI KAREN A CRESWELL · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Optimizing Graphic Warning Labels To Promote Cessation Among Young Adult SmokersK07CA172217 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MAYS, DARREN M · 2014 to 2018
$739k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA172217NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test if consumers perceive filtered "little cigars" as legally-defined cigarettes and identify features they associate with cigarettes but not little cigars and vice versa.

methods1,030 adults (

resultsParticipants perceived filtered "little cigars" as substitutes for cigarettes, perceived certain features to be more like little cigars (e.g., no filter/tip, wrapped in tobacco leaf) and others to be more like cigarettes (e.g., filtered, could be inhaled deeply). In analysis of covariance assessing experimental condition effects, participants viewing images of cigarettes had stronger perceptions that filtered "little cigars" could be used as cigarette substitutes and had cigarette characteristics, but the effect was small.

conclusionsThis study provides new evidence that filtered "little cigars" are perceived by consumers as cigarettes under current laws and identifies features distinguishing little cigars from cigarettes.

Indexed as

consumer perceptionsfiltered cigarsLittle cigars

Identifiers

PMID34765697
PMCPMC8579835
OpenAlexW2913754424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.