Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34765549›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Development and Validation of a Radiomics Model Based on

Beihui Xue, Jia Jiang, Lei Chen, Sunjie Wu, Xuan Zheng, Xiangwu Zheng, Kun Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Development and validation of a machine learning-basedCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prognostic Value of [Cancers · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Beihui XueDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Jia JiangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Lei ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Sunjie WuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xuan ZhengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xiangwu ZhengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Kun TangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Wenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to develop a preoperative positron emission tomography (PET)-based radiomics model for predicting peritoneal metastasis (PM) of gastric cancer (GC).

methodsIn this study, a total of 355 patients (109PM+, 246PM-) who underwent preoperative fluorine-18-fludeoxyglucose (

resultsAfter dimensionality reduction, 12 radiomics feature parameters were obtained to construct radiomics signatures. According to the results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and the radiomics signature showed statistically significant differences between patients (P<0.05). A radiomics model was developed based on the logistic analyses with an AUC of 0.86 in the training cohort and 0.87 in the validation cohort. The clinical prediction model based on CA125 and SUVmax was 0.76 in the training set and 0.69 in the validation set. The comprehensive model, which contained a rad-score and the clinical factor (CA125) as well as the metabolic parameter (SUVmax), showed promising performance with an AUC of 0.90 in the training cohort and 0.88 in the validation cohort, respectively. The calibration curve showed the actual rate of the nomogram-predicted probability of peritoneal metastasis. Decision curve analysis (DCA) also demonstrated the good clinical utility of the radiomics nomogram.

conclusionsThe comprehensive model based on the rad-score and other factors (SUVmax, CA125) can provide a novel tool for predicting peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer patients preoperatively.

Indexed as

gastric cancernomogramperitoneal metastasispositron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)positron emission tomography radiomics (PET radiomics)

Identifiers

PMID34765549
PMCPMC8576566
OpenAlexW3209667120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.