ArticleTranslational pediatrics2021
Comparison between pressure-controlled ventilation with volume-guaranteed mode and volume-controlled mode in one-lung ventilation in infants undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy and safety of extraluminal bronchial blockers in pediatric patients during one-lung ventilation for thoracoscopic surgery.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Pressure controlled ventilation with volume guarantee improves outcomes in neonatal thoracoscopic esophageal atresia surgery.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Pressure Control Ventilation Versus Volume Control Ventilation in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Effect of different mechanical ventilation modes on cerebral blood flow during thoracoscopic surgery in neonates: A randomised controlled trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe appropriate ventilation mode for one-lung ventilation (OLV) in infants undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) remains controversial. Here we investigated the effect of ventilatory mode "pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed" (PCV-VG) on the airway pressures and oxygenation parameters by comparing it with volume-controlled ventilation (VCV).
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of infants aged 2 to 12 months who underwent extratracheal bronchial blockage for OLV in our center between January 2017 and August 2020. The infants were divided into two groups according to the OLV pattern: group G (n=30, receiving PCV-VG) and group V (n=28, receiving VCV). Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), maximum inspiratory pressure (P
resultsCompared to group V, group G had significantly higher PaO
conclusionsMechanical ventilation using the PCV-VG mode is possible in infants when performing OLV during VATS. Compared to VCV, PCV-VG can offer lower P
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.