ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2021
Printability-A key issue in extrusion-based bioprinting.
Review in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
88 citing papers in PubMed.
- A one-step volumetric biofabrication platform for complex hydrogel-based hollow biomaterials.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Machine-Learning-Assisted Quantitative Printability Assessment in Extrusion-Based Bioprinting-A Systems-Engineering Proof-of-Concept.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Handheld Bioprinters in Skin Regeneration: Current Landscape, Clinical Promise, and the Road Ahead.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Ready-to-use 3D bioprinted scaffolds from natural materials loaded with patient's PRGF for personalized skin regeneration.iScience · 2026Article
- Assessment of Bovine Collagen Manufactured via Cellular Agriculture.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026Article
- PVA:ALG Hybrid Bioink for Biofabrication of 3D Neural Models.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Acoustic Bioprinting: A Glimpse Into an Emerging Field.Small methods · 2026Review
- Natural-Based Nanocomposite Ink Engineering for Seamless Multi-Material Integration in Extrusion-Based 3D Printing.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Bio-inks for skin regeneration: phase-adaptive design, multifunctional platforms, and 4D bioprinting frontiers.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Article
- Preparation and Characterization of Alginate-Based Bioinks for Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Cell-Laden Constructs.Current protocols · 2025Article
- 3D necroprinting: Leveraging biotic material as the nozzle for 3D printing.Science advances · 2025Article
- Exploiting nozzle geometry to predict resolution in extrusion-based bioprinting: mathematical modelling of a power-law fluid.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- On the Rheological Properties and Printability of Sodium Alginate-Carboxymethyl Chitosan Composite Solutions for Tissue Scaffold Printing.Biopolymers · 2025Article
- Tuning Rheology and Printability of Gelatin Methacryloyl/Sodium Alginate Bioinks: The Role of Sodium Alginate Molar Mass and Sterilization.ACS omega · 2025Article
- [Research advances in three-dimensional bioprinted wound dressings].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Review
- Development of 3D-printed Ti-MXene incorporated chitosan/HAP nano-composite soft-bone scaffold and its mechanical, anti-biofilm and cell-viability studies.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Genetic and bioactive functionalization of bioinks for 3D bioprinting.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2025Review
- 3D bioprinted human iPSC-derived neural progenitor cells as a novel platform for studying neurogenic niche.APL bioengineering · 2025Article
- Exploring the Rheological Properties of 3D Bioprinted Alginate-Based Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) extrusion-based bioprinting is widely used in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine to create cell-incorporated constructs or scaffolds based on the extrusion technique. One critical issue in 3D extrusion-based bioprinting is printability or the capability to form and maintain reproducible 3D scaffolds from bioink (a mixture of biomaterials and cells). Research shows that printability can be affected by many factors or parameters, including those associated with the bioink, printing process, and scaffold design, but these are far from certain. This review highlights recent developments in the printability assessment of extrusion-based bioprinting with a focus on the definition of printability, printability measurements and characterization, and printability-affecting factors. Key issues and challenges related to printability are also identified and discussed, along with approaches or strategies for improving printability in extrusion-based bioprinting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.