Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34765044›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2021

Tools for studying and modulating (cardiac muscle) cell mechanics and mechanosensing across the scales.

Pamela Swiatlowska, Thomas Iskratsch

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Mitochondrial Adaptation to Mechanical Stress in Cardiac Ageing and Disease.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Autophagy as a Guardian of Vascular Niche Homeostasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cellular reprogramming of fibroblasts in heart regeneration.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Simultaneous assessment of radial and axial myocyte mechanics by combining atomic force microscopy and carbon fibre techniques.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Editors' roundup: October 2022.Biophysical reviews · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pamela SwiatlowskaSchool of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3705-7495
Thomas IskratschSchool of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3738-7830
Queen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiomyocytes generate force for the contraction of the heart to pump blood into the lungs and body. At the same time, they are exquisitely tuned to the mechanical environment and react to e.g. changes in cell and extracellular matrix stiffness or altered stretching due to reduced ejection fraction in heart disease, by adapting their cytoskeleton, force generation and cell mechanics. Both mechanical sensing and cell mechanical adaptations are multiscale processes. Receptor interactions with the extracellular matrix at the nanoscale will lead to clustering of receptors and modification of the cytoskeleton. This in turn alters mechanosensing, force generation, cell and nuclear stiffness and viscoelasticity at the microscale. Further, this affects cell shape, orientation, maturation and tissue integration at the microscale to macroscale. A variety of tools have been developed and adapted to measure cardiomyocyte receptor-ligand interactions and forces or mechanics at the different ranges, resulting in a wealth of new information about cardiomyocyte mechanobiology. Here, we take stock at the different tools for exploring cardiomyocyte mechanosensing and cell mechanics at the different scales from the nanoscale to microscale and macroscale.

Indexed as

Cardiac tissueCardiomyocytesForceMechanobiologyScaleTools

Identifiers

PMID34765044
PMCPMC8553672
OpenAlexW3197567621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.