Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34765043›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2021

Passive myocardial mechanical properties: meaning, measurement, models.

Ramona Emig, Callum M Zgierski-Johnston, Viviane Timmermann, Andrew J Taberner, Martyn P Nash, Peter Kohl, Rémi Peyronnet

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Cardiac myofibril networks induce shear stress.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026
    Article
  17. Soft, Flexible, and Stretchable Platforms for Tissue-Interfaced Bioelectronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  18. Development and Characteristics of a Dual-Layered Vascular Phantom.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ramona EmigInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg, Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany.
Callum M Zgierski-JohnstonInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg, Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany.
Viviane TimmermannInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg, Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany.
Andrew J TabernerAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Martyn P NashAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Peter KohlInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg, Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany.
Rémi PeyronnetInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg, Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5708-6410
University of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Passive mechanical tissue properties are major determinants of myocardial contraction and relaxation and, thus, shape cardiac function. Tightly regulated, dynamically adapting throughout life, and affecting a host of cellular functions, passive tissue mechanics also contribute to cardiac dysfunction. Development of treatments and early identification of diseases requires better spatio-temporal characterisation of tissue mechanical properties and their underlying mechanisms. With this understanding, key regulators may be identified, providing pathways with potential to control and limit pathological development. Methodologies and models used to assess and mimic tissue mechanical properties are diverse, and available data are in part mutually contradictory. In this review, we define important concepts useful for characterising passive mechanical tissue properties, and compare a variety of in vitro and in vivo techniques that allow one to assess tissue mechanics. We give definitions of key terms, and summarise insight into determinants of myocardial stiffness

Indexed as

Extracellular matrixFibrosisHydrogelsNanoindentationScarYoung’s modulus

Identifiers

PMID34765043
PMCPMC8555034
OpenAlexW3210718651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.