Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34764935›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2021

Development of the First WHO Guidelines for Risk Reduction of Cognitive Decline and Dementia: Lessons Learned and Future Directions.

Ruth Stephen, Mariagnese Barbera, Ruth Peters, Nicole Ee, Lidan Zheng, Jenni Lehtisalo, Jenni Kulmala, Krister Håkansson, Neerja Chowdhary, Tarun Dua and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect modifiers of the MIND diet for cognition in older adults: The MIND diet trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cognitive dysfunction in women with theJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Ruth StephenDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Mariagnese BarberaDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Ruth PetersSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nicole EeSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lidan ZhengSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jenni LehtisaloDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Jenni KulmalaPopulation Health Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Krister HåkanssonDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Neerja ChowdharyDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Tarun DuaDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Alina SolomonDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Kaarin J AnsteySchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Miia KivipeltoThe Ageing Epidemiology Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Karolinska Institutet · SENeuroscience Research Australia · AUUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUNSW Sydney · AUWorld Health Organization · CHFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIImperial College London · GBKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first WHO guidelines for risk reduction of cognitive decline and dementia marked an important milestone in the field of dementia prevention. In this paper, we discuss the evidence reviewed as part of the guidelines development and present the main themes emerged from its synthesis, to inform future research and policies on dementia risk reduction. The role of intervention effect-size; the mismatch between observational and intervention-based evidence; the heterogeneity of evidence among intervention trials; the importance of intervention duration; the role of timing of exposure to a certain risk factor and interventions; the relationship between intervention intensity and response; the link between individual risk factors and specific dementia pathologies; and the need for tailored interventions emerged as the main themes. The interaction and clustering of individual risk factors, including genetics, was identified as the overarching theme. The evidence collected indicates that multidomain approaches targeting simultaneously multiple risk factors and tailored at both individual and population level, are likely to be most effective and feasible in dementia risk reduction. The current status of multidomain intervention trials aimed to cognitive impairment/dementia prevention was also briefly reviewed. Primary results were presented focusing on methodological differences and the potential of design harmonization for improving evidence quality. Since multidomain intervention trials address a condition with slow clinical manifestation-like dementia-in a relatively short time frame, the need for surrogate outcomes was also discussed, with a specific focus on the potential utility of dementia risk scores. Finally, we considered how multidomain intervention could be most effectively implemented in a public health context and the implications world-wide for other non-communicable diseases targeting common risk factors, taking into account the limited evidence in low-middle income countries. In conclusion, the evidence from the first WHO guidelines for risk reduction of cognitive decline and dementia indicated that "one size does not fit all," and multidomain approaches adaptable to different populations and individuals are likely to be the most effective. Harmonization in trial design, the use of appropriate outcome measures, and sustainability in large at-risk populations in the context of other chronic disorders also emerged as key elements.

Indexed as

cognitive declinedementiadementia risk reduction guidelinesdementia risk reduction trialsmultidomain interventionstailored interventionsWHO guidelines

Identifiers

PMID34764935
PMCPMC8577650
OpenAlexW3209379876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.