Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34764856›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2021

The Effects of Long Duration Spaceflight on Sensorimotor Control and Cognition.

Grant D Tays, Kathleen E Hupfeld, Heather R McGregor, Ana Paula Salazar, Yiri Eleana De Dios, Nichole E Beltran, Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz, Igor S Kofman, Scott J Wood, Jacob J Bloomberg and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Brain displacement and nonlinear deformation following human spaceflight.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Grant D TaysDepartment of Applied Physiology & Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Kathleen E HupfeldDepartment of Applied Physiology & Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Heather R McGregorDepartment of Applied Physiology & Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Ana Paula SalazarDepartment of Applied Physiology & Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Yiri Eleana De DiosKBR, Inc., Houston, TX, United States.
Nichole E BeltranKBR, Inc., Houston, TX, United States.
Patricia A Reuter-LorenzDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Igor S KofmanKBR, Inc., Houston, TX, United States.
Scott J WoodNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Jacob J BloombergNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Ajitkumar P MulavaraKBR, Inc., Houston, TX, United States.
Rachael D SeidlerDepartment of Applied Physiology & Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astronauts returning from spaceflight typically show transient declines in mobility and balance. Other sensorimotor behaviors and cognitive function have not been investigated as much. Here, we tested whether spaceflight affects performance on various sensorimotor and cognitive tasks during and after missions to the International Space Station (ISS). We obtained mobility (Functional Mobility Test), balance (Sensory Organization Test-5), bimanual coordination (bimanual Purdue Pegboard), cognitive-motor dual-tasking and various other cognitive measures (Digit Symbol Substitution Test, Cube Rotation, Card Rotation, Rod and Frame Test) before, during and after 15 astronauts completed 6 month missions aboard the ISS. We used linear mixed effect models to analyze performance changes due to entering the microgravity environment, behavioral adaptations aboard the ISS and subsequent recovery from microgravity. We observed declines in mobility and balance from pre- to post-flight, suggesting disruption and/or down weighting of vestibular inputs; these behaviors recovered to baseline levels within 30 days post-flight. We also identified bimanual coordination declines from pre- to post-flight and recovery to baseline levels within 30 days post-flight. There were no changes in dual-task performance during or following spaceflight. Cube rotation response time significantly improved from pre- to post-flight, suggestive of practice effects. There was also a trend for better in-flight cube rotation performance on the ISS when crewmembers had their feet in foot loops on the "floor" throughout the task. This suggests that tactile inputs to the foot sole aided orientation. Overall, these results suggest that sensory reweighting due to the microgravity environment of spaceflight affected sensorimotor performance, while cognitive performance was maintained. A shift from exocentric (gravity) spatial references on Earth toward an egocentric spatial reference may also occur aboard the ISS. Upon return to Earth, microgravity adaptions become maladaptive for certain postural tasks, resulting in transient sensorimotor performance declines that recover within 30 days.

Indexed as

Space FlightWeightlessnessAstronautsCognitionHumansTime Factorsbalancecognitionmicrogravitymobilitysensorimotorspaceflight

Identifiers

PMID34764856
PMCPMC8577506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.