Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34764619›Full record

ArticleApplied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2022

Machine learning techniques to predict different levels of hospital care of CoVid-19.

Elena Hernández-Pereira, Oscar Fontenla-Romero, Verónica Bolón-Canedo, Brais Cancela-Barizo, Bertha Guijarro-Berdiñas, Amparo Alonso-Betanzos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elena Hernández-PereiraUniversidade da Coruña. CITIC Research and Development Laboratory in Artificial Intelligence (LIDIA) Facultad de informática, Campus de Elviña s/n. A, Coruña, Spain.
Oscar Fontenla-RomeroUniversidade da Coruña. CITIC Research and Development Laboratory in Artificial Intelligence (LIDIA) Facultad de informática, Campus de Elviña s/n. A, Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4203-8720
Verónica Bolón-CanedoUniversidade da Coruña. CITIC Research and Development Laboratory in Artificial Intelligence (LIDIA) Facultad de informática, Campus de Elviña s/n. A, Coruña, Spain.
Brais Cancela-BarizoUniversidade da Coruña. CITIC Research and Development Laboratory in Artificial Intelligence (LIDIA) Facultad de informática, Campus de Elviña s/n. A, Coruña, Spain.
Bertha Guijarro-BerdiñasUniversidade da Coruña. CITIC Research and Development Laboratory in Artificial Intelligence (LIDIA) Facultad de informática, Campus de Elviña s/n. A, Coruña, Spain.
Amparo Alonso-BetanzosUniversidade da Coruña. CITIC Research and Development Laboratory in Artificial Intelligence (LIDIA) Facultad de informática, Campus de Elviña s/n. A, Coruña, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we analyze the capability of several state of the art machine learning methods to predict whether patients diagnosed with CoVid-19 (CoronaVirus disease 2019) will need different levels of hospital care assistance (regular hospital admission or intensive care unit admission), during the course of their illness, using only demographic and clinical data. For this research, a data set of 10,454 patients from 14 hospitals in Galicia (Spain) was used. Each patient is characterized by 833 variables, two of which are age and gender and the other are records of diseases or conditions in their medical history. In addition, for each patient, his/her history of hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) admissions due to CoVid-19 is available. This clinical history will serve to label each patient and thus being able to assess the predictions of the model. Our aim is to identify which model delivers the best accuracies for both hospital and ICU admissions only using demographic variables and some structured clinical data, as well as identifying which of those are more relevant in both cases. The results obtained in the experimental study show that the best models are those based on oversampling as a preprocessing phase to balance the distribution of classes. Using these models and all the available features, we achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 76.1% and 80.4% for predicting the need of hospital and ICU admissions, respectively. Furthermore, feature selection and oversampling techniques were applied and it has been experimentally verified that the relevant variables for the classification are age and gender, since only using these two features the performance of the models is not degraded for the two mentioned prediction problems.

Indexed as

CoVid-19Feature selectionMachine learningSupervised classification

Identifiers

PMID34764619
PMCPMC8429889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.