ArticleApplied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2022
Cross-sectional analysis and data-driven forecasting of confirmed COVID-19 cases.
Article in Applied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explaining complex dynamical systems using conditional SHAP analysis with application to multi-variant epidemic dynamics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Towards Improved XAI-Based Epidemiological Research into the Next Potential Pandemic.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- AI-powered COVID-19 forecasting: a comprehensive comparison of advanced deep learning methods.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2024Article
- Deep learning in public health: Comparative predictive models for COVID-19 case forecasting.PloS one · 2024Article
- COVID-19 Patterns in Araraquara, Brazil: A Multimodal Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Harnessing the power of AI: Advanced deep learning models optimization for accurate SARS-CoV-2 forecasting.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is rapidly becoming one of the leading causes for mortality worldwide. Various models have been built in previous works to study the spread characteristics and trends of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, due to the limited information and data source, the understanding of the spread and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is still restricted. Therefore, within this paper not only daily historical time-series data of COVID-19 have been taken into account during the modeling, but also regional attributes, e.g., geographic and local factors, which may have played an important role on the confirmed COVID-19 cases in certain regions. In this regard, this study then conducts a comprehensive cross-sectional analysis and data-driven forecasting on this pandemic. The critical features, which has the significant influence on the infection rate of COVID-19, is determined by employing XGB (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) algorithm and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanation) and the comparison is carried out by utilizing the RF (Random Forest) and LGB (Light Gradient Boosting) models. To forecast the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases more accurately, a Dual-Stage Attention-Based Recurrent Neural Network (DA-RNN) is applied in this paper. This model has better performance than SVR (Support Vector Regression) and the encoder-decoder network on the experimental dataset. And the model performance is evaluated in the light of three statistic metrics, i.e. MAE, RMSE and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.