ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2021
NUTRIC score as a predictor of outcome in COVID-19 ARDS patients: A retrospective observational study.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Factors Affecting Mortality Among Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of six nutritional scores in predicting prognosis of COVID-19 patients.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- The NUTRIC Score as a Tool to Predict Mortality and Increased Resource Utilization in Intensive Care Patients with Sepsis.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Article
- Optimising clinical outcomes with innovative research in the intensive care unit.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2022Article
- Nutritional Risk Assessment Scores Effectively Predict Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Severe COVID-19.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Striving towards excellence in research on biomarkers.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2022Article
- The modified NUTRIC score (mNUTRIC) is associated with increased 28-day mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients: Internal validation of a prediction model.Clinical nutrition ESPEN · 2022Article
- Adopting newer strategies of perioperative quality improvement: The bandwagon moves on….Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe Nutrition Risk in Critically ill (NUTRIC) score is an appropriate nutritional assessment tool in mechanically ventilated patients. We retrospectively observed the applicability of the NUTRIC score for predicting outcomes in coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients.
methodsAll adult COVID-19 ARDS patients admitted to the intensive care unit and requiring various forms of oxygen therapy were included in the study. The demographic characteristics and clinical information about the patients were obtained from the hospital's medical records department. The nutritional risk for each patient was assessed using the NUTRIC score at 72 hours of ICU admission. The discriminating power and ability of NUTRIC score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, age and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II to predict the 28-day mortality and need for mechanical ventilation (MV) was calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves and area under this curve.
resultsA total of 80 COVID-19 ARDS patients fitted into the inclusion criteria. Among non-survivors, the median Glasgow Coma Score, APACHE II score, NUTRIC score and SOFA score were 10, 16, 6 and 4, respectively. The cut-off values for NUTRIC score, SOFA, and APACHE II to predict 28-day mortality and need for MV was obtained as 3.5, 3.5 and 11.5, respectively. These cut-off values of NUTRIC score, SOFA score, and APACHE II have a sensitivity of 62%, 72.5% and 75.5%, respectively, and specificity of 95%, 72% and 83% for predicting mortality.
conclusionsMost COVID-19 ARDS patients requiring MV in the ICU are at nutritional risk, and a high NUTRIC score is associated with higher mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.