Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34764430›Full record

ArticleNature materials2022

Large-scale fabrication of structurally coloured cellulose nanocrystal films and effect pigments.

Benjamin E Droguet, Hsin-Ling Liang, Bruno Frka-Petesic, Richard M Parker, Michael F L De Volder, Jeremy J Baumberg, Silvia Vignolini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Designing for Degradation: Transient Devices Enabled by (Nano)Cellulose.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benjamin E DroguetBio-inspired Photonics Group, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Hsin-Ling LiangNanomanufacturing Group, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Bruno Frka-PetesicBio-inspired Photonics Group, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5002-5685
Richard M ParkerBio-inspired Photonics Group, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4096-9161
Michael F L De VolderNanomanufacturing Group, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1955-2270
Jeremy J BaumbergNanophotonics Centre, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9606-9488
Silvia VignoliniBio-inspired Photonics Group, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. sv319@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0664-1418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellulose nanocrystals are renewable plant-based colloidal particles capable of forming photonic films by solvent-evaporation-driven self-assembly. So far, the cellulose nanocrystal self-assembly process has been studied only at a small scale, neglecting the limitations and challenges posed by the continuous deposition processes that are required to exploit this sustainable material in an industrial context. Here, we addressed these limitations by using roll-to-roll deposition to produce large-area photonic films, which required optimization of the formulation of the cellulose nanocrystal suspension and the deposition and drying conditions. Furthermore, we showed how metre-long structurally coloured films can be processed into effect pigments and glitters that are dispersible, even in water-based formulations. These promising effect pigments are an industrially relevant cellulose-based alternative to current products that are either micro-polluting (for example, non-biodegradable microplastic glitters) or based on carcinogenic, unsustainable or unethically sourced compounds (for example, titania or mica).

Indexed as

CelluloseNanoparticlesPlasticsSolventsWaterCellulosePlasticsSolventsWater

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.