ArticleScientific reports2021
Perforated flexible catheters improve joint fluid aspiration in shoulder cadavers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A fluoroscopically controlled anterior approach in supine position is often used for arthrocentesis of the shoulder, but can lead to a high rate of dry aspirations. The aim of this study was to compare the aspiration performance of rigid needles and flexible catheters used with this approach. We hypothesized that a flexible catheter can significantly improve the amount of the obtained fluid. The glenohumeral joint of ten human cadaveric shoulder specimens were sequentially filled with 5, 10, 20 and 30 mL of contrast agent. For each volume the maximum aspirated amount of contrast agent with 4 different aspiration devices (20 gauge needle, 16 gauge needle, 16 gauge flexible catheter and 16 gauge perforated flexible catheter) were compared. All aspirations were done in supine cadaver position from anterior under fluoroscopic control. The aspirated amount of fluid was significantly higher using the 16 gauge perforated flexible catheter (p = 0.002-0.028) compared with all other devices when 5, 10 and 20 mL of contrast agent were in the joint. This perforated flexible catheter aspirated 80-96% of the available fluid while the standard 20 gauge needle aspirated 40-60%. Using a 16 gauge perforated flexible catheter in a supine anterior arthrocentesis technique results in aspiration of most of the fluid in human cadaveric shoulder specimens, while standard needles aspirate only about 50% of it. This can be clinically relevant when there is very little synovial fluid available and might reduce the number of insufficient aspirations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.