Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34764330›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Fine-scale spatial segregation in a pelagic seabird driven by differential use of tidewater glacier fronts.

Philip Bertrand, Joël Bêty, Nigel G Yoccoz, Marie-Josée Fortin, Hallvard Strøm, Harald Steen, Jack Kohler, Stephanie M Harris, Samantha C Patrick, Olivier Chastel and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Spatial segregation and bycatch risk as potential drivers of population trends of wandering albatrosses at South Georgia.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Interannual variation in foraging decisions in chick-rearing black-legged kittiwakes.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Philip BertrandDépartement de biologie, chimie et géographie & Centre d'études nordiques, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, G5L 3A1, Canada. philip.bertrand@uqar.ca.
Joël BêtyDépartement de biologie, chimie et géographie & Centre d'études nordiques, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, G5L 3A1, Canada.
Nigel G YoccozDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, 9037, Norway.
Marie-Josée FortinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5S 3B2, Canada.
Hallvard StrømNorwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Tromsø, 9296, Norway.
Harald SteenNorwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Tromsø, 9296, Norway.
Jack KohlerNorwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Tromsø, 9296, Norway.
Stephanie M HarrisCornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, 159 Sapsucker Woods Road, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.
Samantha C PatrickSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GP, UK.
Olivier ChastelCentre d'études biologiques de Chizé (CEBC), UMR 7372, CNRS & Université de La Rochelle, Villiers-en-Bois, 79360, France.
P BlévinCentre d'études biologiques de Chizé (CEBC), UMR 7372, CNRS & Université de La Rochelle, Villiers-en-Bois, 79360, France.
Haakon HopNorwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Tromsø, 9296, Norway.
Geir MoholdtNorwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Tromsø, 9296, Norway.
Joséphine MatonNorwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Tromsø, 9296, Norway.
Sébastien DescampsNorwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Tromsø, 9296, Norway.
Norwegian Polar Institute · NOCenter for Northern Studies · CACentre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé · FRUniversity of Liverpool · GBUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Institut Polaire Français Paul Emile Victor Prog 330Mitacs GlobalinkNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada ES D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In colonially breeding marine predators, individual movements and colonial segregation are influenced by seascape characteristics. Tidewater glacier fronts are important features of the Arctic seascape and are often described as foraging hotspots. Albeit their documented importance for wildlife, little is known about their structuring effect on Arctic predator movements and space use. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that tidewater glacier fronts can influence marine bird foraging patterns and drive spatial segregation among adjacent colonies. We analysed movements of black-legged kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) in a glacial fjord by tracking breeding individuals from five colonies. Although breeding kittiwakes were observed to travel up to ca. 280 km from the colony, individuals were more likely to use glacier fronts located closer to their colony and rarely used glacier fronts located farther away than 18 km. Such variation in the use of glacier fronts created fine-scale spatial segregation among the four closest (ca. 7 km distance on average) kittiwake colonies. Overall, our results support the hypothesis that spatially predictable foraging patches like glacier fronts can have strong structuring effects on predator movements and can modulate the magnitude of intercolonial spatial segregation in central-place foragers.

Indexed as

AnimalsArctic RegionsBirdsCharadriiformesEcosystemEstuariesFeeding BehaviorIce CoverSeasons

Identifiers

PMID34764330
PMCPMC8586018
OpenAlexW3211788601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.