Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34764172›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Integrating expert knowledge for dementia risk prediction in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI): a study protocol.

Meng Wang, Eric E Smith, Nils Daniel Forkert, Thierry Chekouo, Zahinoor Ismail, Aravind Ganesh, Tolulope Sajobi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Meng WangDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences & Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7955-6981
Eric E SmithDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences & Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3956-1668
Nils Daniel ForkertDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences & Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Thierry ChekouoDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Zahinoor IsmailDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences & Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Aravind GaneshDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences & Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5520-2070
Tolulope SajobiDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences & Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada ttsajobi@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-5696-5552
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NATIONAL ALZHEIMERS COORDINATING CENTER (NACC)U01AG016976 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KUKULL, WALTER ANTHONY · 1999 to 2020
$72.8M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG016976NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo date, there is no broadly accepted dementia risk score for use in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), partly because there are few large datasets available for model development. When evidence is limited, the knowledge and experience of experts becomes more crucial for risk stratification and providing MCI patients with prognosis. Structured expert elicitation (SEE) includes formal methods to quantify experts' beliefs and help experts to express their beliefs in a quantitative form, reducing biases in the process. This study proposes to (1) assess experts' beliefs about important predictors for 3-year dementia risk in persons with MCI through SEE methodology and (2) to integrate expert knowledge and patient data to derive dementia risk scores in persons with MCI using a Bayesian approach. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will use a combination of SEE methodology, prospectively collected clinical data, and statistical modelling to derive a dementia risk score in persons with MCI . Clinical expert knowledge will be quantified using SEE methodology that involves the selection and training of the experts, administration of questionnaire for eliciting expert knowledge, discussion meetings and results aggregation. Patient data from the Prospective Registry for Persons with Memory Symptoms of the Cognitive Neurosciences Clinic at the University of Calgary; the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; and the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center's Uniform Data Set will be used for model training and validation. Bayesian Cox models will be used to incorporate patient data and elicited data to predict 3-year dementia risk. DISCUSSION: This study will develop a robust dementia risk score that incorporates clinician expert knowledge with patient data for accurate risk stratification, prognosis and management of dementia.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionBayes TheoremDisease ProgressionHumansSensitivity and Specificitydementiaepidemiologyhealth informaticsstatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID34764172
PMCPMC8587594
OpenAlexW3213582937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.