Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34764159›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Speech Categorization Reveals the Role of Early-Stage Temporal-Coherence Processing in Auditory Scene Analysis.

Vibha Viswanathan, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham, Michael G Heinz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A perceptual grouping model for auditory kappa effects.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2026
    Article
  3. Prediction from Statistical Learning Aids Auditory Scene Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Binaural fusion: Complexities in definition and measurement.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Peripheral neural synchrony in post-lingually deafened adult cochlear implant users.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. FORUM: Remote testing for psychological and physiological acoustics.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vibha ViswanathanWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 viswanav@purdue.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3475-421X
Barbara G Shinn-CunninghamNeuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Michael G HeinzWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907.ORCID 0000-0002-1524-402X
Purdue University West Lafayette · USCarnegie Mellon University · US

Funding

Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Robust Speech CodingR01DC009838 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI Michael G Heinz · 2009 to 2026
$6.1M
Neurophysiological Mechanisms of Speech Intelligibility in Noise - A Quantitative FrameworkF31DC017381 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI VISWANATHAN, VIBHA · 2018 to 2020
$134k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC017381NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporal coherence of sound fluctuations across spectral channels is thought to aid auditory grouping and scene segregation. Although prior studies on the neural bases of temporal-coherence processing focused mostly on cortical contributions, neurophysiological evidence suggests that temporal-coherence-based scene analysis may start as early as the cochlear nucleus (i.e., the first auditory region supporting cross-channel processing over a wide frequency range). Accordingly, we hypothesized that aspects of temporal-coherence processing that could be realized in early auditory areas may shape speech understanding in noise. We then explored whether physiologically plausible computational models could account for results from a behavioral experiment that measured consonant categorization in different masking conditions. We tested whether within-channel masking of target-speech modulations predicted consonant confusions across the different conditions and whether predictions were improved by adding across-channel temporal-coherence processing mirroring the computations known to exist in the cochlear nucleus. Consonant confusions provide a rich characterization of error patterns in speech categorization, and are thus crucial for rigorously testing models of speech perception; however, to the best of our knowledge, they have not been used in prior studies of scene analysis. We find that within-channel modulation masking can reasonably account for category confusions, but that it fails when temporal fine structure cues are unavailable. However, the addition of across-channel temporal-coherence processing significantly improves confusion predictions across all tested conditions. Our results suggest that temporal-coherence processing strongly shapes speech understanding in noise and that physiological computations that exist early along the auditory pathway may contribute to this process.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionAuditory ThresholdCochleaHumansModels, NeurologicalPerceptual MaskingSpeechcochlear nucleuscomodulation masking releasecomputational modelingconsonant confusionscross-channel processingwideband inhibition

Identifiers

PMID34764159
PMCPMC8802934
OpenAlexW3211904679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.