Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34763946›Full record

ArticleVaccine2021

Reactogenicity within 2 weeks after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: Findings from the CDC v-safe surveillance system.

Johanna Chapin-Bardales, Tanya Myers, Julianne Gee, David K Shay, Paige Marquez, James Baggs, Bicheng Zhang, Charles Licata, Tom T Shimabukuro

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oral Lesions Following Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Information systems for vaccine safety surveillance.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  14. Adverse effect investigation using application software after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 for healthcare workers.Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Johanna Chapin-BardalesCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Tanya MyersCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Julianne GeeCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA. Electronic address: ecoevent416@cdc.gov.
David K ShayCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Paige MarquezCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
James BaggsCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Bicheng ZhangCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Charles LicataCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Tom T ShimabukuroCDC COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-authorization monitoring of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines is needed to better characterize their reactogenicity. We assessed reactions reported during the 2 weeks after receipt of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccines.

methodsWe monitored persons who enrolled in v-safe after vaccination health checker

resultsOne-third of participants were aged <45 years, two-thirds were female, and approximately half received BNT162b2 vaccine. A total of 4,717,908 participants reported during the 7 days after dose 1 and 2,906,377 reported during the 7 days after dose 2. Most reported at least one injection-site reaction (68.5% after dose 1; 72.9% after dose 2) or at least one systemic reaction (50.6% after dose 1; 69.5% after dose 2). Reactogenicity was greater after dose 2 and among mRNA-1273 recipients, persons aged <45 years, and females. New or worsening local and systemic reactions were uncommon during week 2 after either dose; the most frequent were local reactions for dose 1 mRNA-1273 recipients (2.6%). These reactions were reported more often among females after dose 1 mRNA-1273 (3.6%).

conclusionsDuring post-authorization monitoring among >4 million vaccinees, local and systemic reactions were commonly reported following mRNA-based vaccines. Reactions were most common during the first week following dose 2 and among persons aged <45 years, females, and mRNA-1273 recipients.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesBNT162 VaccineCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.FemaleHumansRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2United StatesBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesRNA, MessengerCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccinesmRNA COVID-19 vaccinesReactogenicity

Identifiers

PMID34763946
PMCPMC8519847
OpenAlexW3206453350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.