Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34763772›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American College of Cardiology2021

Cost-Effectiveness of Lipid-Lowering Treatments in Young Adults.

Ciaran N Kohli-Lynch, Brandon K Bellows, Yiyi Zhang, Bonnie Spring, Dhruv S Kazi, Mark J Pletcher, Eric Vittinghoff, Norrina B Allen, Andrew E Moran

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ciaran N Kohli-LynchDivision of General Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Brandon K BellowsDivision of General Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Yiyi ZhangDivision of General Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Bonnie SpringDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Dhruv S KaziSmith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mark J PletcherDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California-San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
Eric VittinghoffDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California-San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
Norrina B AllenDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Andrew E MoranDivision of General Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: aem35@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

Familial hypercholesterolemia screening in children: population impact of phenotype, genotype, and cascade approachesR01HL141823 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DE FERRANTI, SARAH D, MORAN, ANDREW EDWARD · 2019 to 2022
$3.3M
Potential future benefits of cardiovascular risk factor control in today’s young adultsR01HL107475 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MORAN, ANDREW EDWARD · 2011 to 2018
$2.5M
Comparing the value of intensive systolic blood pressure treatment implementation strategiesK01HL140170 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BELLOWS, BRANDON K · 2018 to 2022
$709k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL140170NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL107475NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRaised low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in young adulthood (aged 18-39 years) is associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) later in life. Most young adults with elevated LDL-C do not currently receive lipid-lowering treatment.

objectivesThis study aimed to estimate the prevalence of elevated LDL-C in ASCVD-free U.S. young adults and the cost-effectiveness of lipid-lowering strategies for raised LDL-C in young adulthood compared with standard care.

methodsThe prevalence of raised LDL-C was examined in the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The CVD Policy Model projected lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), health care costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for lipid-lowering strategies. Standard care was statin treatment for adults aged ≥40 years based on LDL-C, ASCVD risk, or diabetes plus young adults with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL. Lipid lowering incremental to standard care with moderate-intensity statins or intensive lifestyle interventions was simulated starting when young adult LDL-C was either ≥160 mg/dL or ≥130 mg/dL.

resultsApproximately 27% of ASCVD-free young adults have LDL-C of ≥130 mg/dL, and 9% have LDL-C of ≥160 mg/dL. The model projected that young adult lipid lowering with statins or lifestyle interventions would prevent lifetime ASCVD events and increase QALYs compared with standard care. ICERs were US$31,000/QALY for statins in young adult men with LDL-C of ≥130 mg/dL and US$106,000/QALY for statins in young adult women with LDL-C of ≥130 mg/dL. Intensive lifestyle intervention was more costly and less effective than statin therapy.

conclusionsStatin treatment for LDL-C of ≥130 mg/dL is highly cost-effective in young adult men and intermediately cost-effective in young adult women.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLCohort StudiesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLife StyleLipidsMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysProbabilityCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipidscardiovascular diseasecholesterolcost-effectivenessstatinsyoung adulthood

Identifiers

PMID34763772
PMCPMC8597932
OpenAlexW3214462482

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.