Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34763749›Full record

ArticleComparative medicine2021

Evaluation of Effects of Laboratory Disinfectants on Mouse Gut Microbiota.

Joseph D Sciurba, George E Chlipala, Stefan J Green, Martha A Delaney, Jeffrey D Fortman, Jeanette E Purcell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Bedding as a variable affecting fasting blood glucose and vascular physiology in mice.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph D SciurbaBiologic Resources Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois;, Email: sciurba@ohsu.edu.
George E ChlipalaResearch Informatics Core, Research Resources Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Stefan J GreenGenome Research Core, Research Resources Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Martha A DelaneyZoological Pathology Program, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Brookfield, Illinois.
Jeffrey D FortmanBiologic Resources Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Jeanette E PurcellBiologic Resources Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
University of Illinois Chicago · USChicago Zoological Society · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disturbances in the gut microbiota are known to be associated with numerous human diseases. Mice have proven to be an invaluable tool for investigating the role of the gut microbiota in disease processes. Nonexperimental factors related to maintaining mice in the laboratory environment are increasingly being shown to have inadvertent effects on the gut microbiota and may function as confounding variables. Microisolation technique is a term used to describe the common biosecurity practice of spraying gloved hands with disinfectant before handling research mice. This practice prevents contamination with pathogenic microorganisms. To investigate if exposure to disinfectants can affect the mouse gut microbiota, C57BL/6 mice were exposed daily for 27 consecutive days to commonly used laboratory disinfectants through microisolation technique. The effects of 70% ethanol and disinfectant products containing chlorine dioxide, hydrogen peroxide, or potassium peroxymonosulfate were each evaluated. Fecal pellets were collected after 7, 14, 21, and 28 d of disinfectant exposure, and cecal contents were collected at day 28. DNA extractions were performed on all cecal and fecal samples, and microbial community structure was characterized using 16S ribosomal RNA amplicon sequencing. Alpha and β diversity metrics and taxon-level analyses were used to evaluate differences in microbial communities. Disinfectant had a small but significant effect on fecal microbial communities compared with sham-exposed controls, and effects varied by disinfectant type. In general, longer exposure times resulted in greater changes in the fecal microbiota. Effects on the cecal microbiota were less pronounced and only seen with the hydrogen peroxide and potassium peroxymonosulfate disinfectants. These results indicate that laboratory disinfectant use should be considered as a potential factor that can affect the mouse gut microbiota.

Indexed as

DisinfectantsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBiosecurityFecesLaboratoriesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDisinfectantsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID34763749
PMCPMC8715766
OpenAlexW3212219765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.