Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34763701›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Co-design of a digital dietary intervention for adults at risk of type 2 diabetes.

Brenda S J Tay, Sarah M Edney, Grant D Brinkworth, David N Cox, Bonnie Wiggins, Aaron Davis, Ian Gwilt, Annemien Haveman-Nies, Jillian C Ryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An Age-Adapted Co-Design Methodology for Community Health Research Involving Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Co-Designing a Digital Stroke Prevention Platform: Leveraging Lived Experience and Expert Advice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brenda S J TayNutrition & Dietetics, College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia. brendatay3@gmail.com.
Sarah M EdneyPhysical Activity and Nutrition Determinants in Asia (PANDA), Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Grant D BrinkworthCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) - Health and Biosecurity, 11 Julius Avenue, North Ryde, NSW, 2113, Australia.
David N CoxCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) - Health and Biosecurity, 13 Kintore Avenue, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Bonnie WigginsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) - Health and Biosecurity, 13 Kintore Avenue, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Aaron DavisUniSA Creative, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Ian GwiltUniSA Creative, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Annemien Haveman-NiesConsumption and Healthy Lifestyles, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jillian C RyanCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) - Health and Biosecurity, 13 Kintore Avenue, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCo-design has the potential to create interventions that lead to sustainable health behaviour change. Evidence suggests application of co-design in various health domains has been growing; however, few public-facing digital interventions have been co-designed to specifically address the needs of adults at risk of Type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aims to: (1) co-design, with key stakeholders, a digital dietary intervention to promote health behaviour change among adults at risk of T2D, and (2) evaluate the co-design process involved in developing the intervention prototype.

methodsThe co-design study was based on a partnership between nutrition researchers and designers experienced in co-design for health. Potential end-users (patients and health professionals) were recruited from an earlier stage of the study. Three online workshops were conducted to develop and review prototypes of an app for people at risk of T2D. Themes were inductively defined and aligned with persuasive design (PD) principles used to inform ideal app features and characteristics.

resultsParticipants were predominantly female (range 58-100%), aged 38 to 63 years (median age = 59 years), consisting of a total of 20 end-users and four experts. Participants expressed the need for information from credible sources and to provide effective strategies to overcome social and environmental influences on eating behaviours. Preferred app features included tailoring to the individual's unique characteristics, ability to track and monitor dietary behaviour, and tools to facilitate controlled social connectivity. Relevant persuasive design principles included social support, reduction (reducing effort needed to reach target behaviour), tunnelling (guiding users through a process that leads to target behaviour), praise, rewards, and self-monitoring. The most preferred prototype was the Choices concept, which focusses on the users' journey of health behaviour change and recognises progress, successes, and failures in a supportive and encouraging manner. The workshops were rated successful, and feedback was positive.

conclusionsThe study's co-design methods were successful in developing a functionally appealing and relevant digital health promotion intervention. Continuous engagement with stakeholders such as designers and end-users is needed to further develop a working prototype for testing.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansMiddle AgedPersuasive CommunicationSocial SupportCo-designDigital dietary interventionHealth behaviourParticipatory researchPre-diabetesType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID34763701
PMCPMC8582335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.