Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34763677›Full record

ReviewBMC palliative care2021

A novel care guide for personalised palliative care - a national initiative for improved quality of care.

Dröfn Birgisdóttir, Anette Duarte, Anna Dahlman, Bengt Sallerfors, Birgit H Rasmussen, Carl Johan Fürst

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dröfn BirgisdóttirFaculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology and Pathology, Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University, Scheeletorget 1, Hus 404B, 223 81, Lund, Sweden. drofn.birgisdottir@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5119-7489
Anette DuarteThe Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.
Anna DahlmanFaculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology and Pathology, Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University, Scheeletorget 1, Hus 404B, 223 81, Lund, Sweden.
Bengt SallerforsFaculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology and Pathology, Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University, Scheeletorget 1, Hus 404B, 223 81, Lund, Sweden.
Birgit H RasmussenThe Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.
Carl Johan FürstFaculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology and Pathology, Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University, Scheeletorget 1, Hus 404B, 223 81, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SE

Funding

The Kamprad Family Foundation The Kamprad Family Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven when palliative care is an integrated part of the healthcare system, the quality is still substandard for many patients and often initiated too late. There is a lack of structured guidelines for identifying and caring for patients; in particular for those with early palliative care needs. A care guide can act as a compass for best practice and support the care of patients throughout their palliative trajectory. Such a guide should both meet the needs of health care professionals and patients and families, facilitating discussion around end-of-life decision-making and enabling them to plan for the remaining time in life. The aim of this article is to describe the development and pilot testing of a novel Swedish palliative care guide.

methodsThe Swedish Palliative Care Guide (S-PCG) was developed according to the Medical Research Council framework and based on national and international guidelines for good palliative care. An interdisciplinary national advisory committee of over 90 health care professionals together with patient, family and public representatives were engaged in the process. The feasibility was tested in three pilot studies in different care settings.

resultsAfter extensive multi-unit and interprofessional testing and evaluation, the S-PCG contains three parts that can be used independently to identify, assess, address, follow up, and document the individual symptoms and care-needs throughout the whole palliative care trajectory. The S-PCG can provide a comprehensive overview and shared understanding of the patients' needs and possibilities for ensuring optimal quality of life, the family included.

conclusionsBased on broad professional cooperation, patients and family participation and clinical testing, the S-PCG provides unique interprofessional guidance for assessment and holistic care of patients with palliative care needs, promotes support to the family, and when properly used supports high-quality personalised palliative care throughout the palliative trajectory. Future steps for the S-PCG, entails scientific evaluation of the clinical impact and effect of S-PCG in different care settings - including implementation, patient and family outcomes, and experiences of patient, family and personnel.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingPalliative CareHealth PersonnelHumansPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeClinical pathwayClinical practice guidelinesDecision supportDyingEarly identificationEarly Palliative CarePalliative carePatient-centred carePersonalised careQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID34763677
PMCPMC8582140
OpenAlexW3212744870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.