Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34763654›Full record

ReviewCellular & molecular biology letters2021

Laboratory methods to decipher epigenetic signatures: a comparative review.

Raheleh Halabian, Valizadeh Arshad, Ali Ahmadi, Pardis Saeedi, Sadegh Azimzadeh Jamalkandi, Mohammad Reza Alivand

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular & molecular biology letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. DNA Methylation Pattern and mRNA Expression Level of E-Cadherin and P16 Genes in Thrombotic Disorders.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raheleh HalabianApplied Microbiology Research Center, Systems Biology and Poisonings Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Valizadeh ArshadDepartment of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute For Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Ali AhmadiMolecular Biology Research Center, Systems Biology and Poisonings Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Pardis SaeediApplied Microbiology Research Center, Systems Biology and Poisonings Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sadegh Azimzadeh JamalkandiChemical Injuries Research Center, Systems Biology and Poisonings Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Mollasadra Ave., 14359-16471, Tehran, Iran. azimzadeh.jam.sadegh@gmail.com.
Mohammad Reza AlivandDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. mohammadreza_alivand@yahoo.com.
Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences · IRRoyan Institute · IRTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 61435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetics refers to nucleotide sequence-independent events, and heritable changes, including DNA methylation and histone modification (as the two main processes), contributing to the phenotypic features of the cell. Both genetics and epigenetics contribute to determining the outcome of regulatory gene expression systems. Indeed, the flexibility of epigenetic effects and stability of genetic coding lead to gene regulation complexity in response signals. Since some epigenetic changes are significant in abnormalities such as cancers and neurodegenerative diseases, the initial changes, dynamic and reversible properties, and diagnostic potential of epigenomic phenomena are subject to epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) for therapeutic aims. Based on recent studies, methodological developments are necessary to improve epigenetic research. As a result, several methods have been developed to explore epigenetic alterations at low, medium, and high scales, focusing on DNA methylation and histone modification detection. In this research field, bisulfite-, enzyme sensitivity- and antibody specificity-based techniques are used for DNA methylation, whereas histone modifications are gained based on antibody recognition. This review provides a mechanism-based understanding and comparative overview of the most common techniques for detecting the status of epigenetic effects, including DNA methylation and histone modifications, for applicable approaches from low- to high-throughput scales.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsGene Expression RegulationHistone CodeHistonesHumansHistonesDNA methylationEpigeneticsHistone modificationsTechniques

Identifiers

PMID34763654
PMCPMC8582164
OpenAlexW3212140403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.