Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34763597›Full record

ArticleGut microbes

An integrated workflow for enhanced taxonomic and functional coverage of the mouse fecal metaproteome.

Nicolas Nalpas, Lesley Hoyles, Viktoria Anselm, Tariq Ganief, Laura Martinez-Gili, Cristina Grau, Irina Droste-Borel, Laetitia Davidovic, Xavier Altafaj, Marc-Emmanuel Dumas and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut microbes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicolas NalpasProteome Center Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Lesley HoylesBiomolecular Medicine Section, Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Viktoria AnselmProteome Center Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Tariq GaniefProteome Center Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Laura Martinez-GiliBiomolecular Medicine Section, Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5271-9672
Cristina GrauPharmacology unit, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Irina Droste-BorelProteome Center Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Laetitia DavidovicDepartment of Life Science, Université Côte d'Azur, 06103 Nice, France.
Xavier AltafajPharmacology unit, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Marc-Emmanuel DumasBiomolecular Medicine Section, Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Boris MacekProteome Center Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1206-2458

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L01632X/1Medical Research Council MR/M501797/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intestinal microbiota plays a key role in shaping host homeostasis by regulating metabolism, immune responses and behavior. Its dysregulation has been associated with metabolic, immune and neuropsychiatric disorders and is accompanied by changes in bacterial metabolic regulation. Although proteomics is well suited for analysis of individual microbes, metaproteomics of fecal samples is challenging due to the physical structure of the sample, presence of contaminating host proteins and coexistence of hundreds of taxa. Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus regarding preparation of fecal samples, as well as downstream bioinformatic analyses following metaproteomics data acquisition. Here we assess sample preparation and data analysis strategies applied to mouse feces in a typical mass spectrometry-based metaproteomic experiment. We show that subtle changes in sample preparation protocols may influence interpretation of biological findings. Two-step database search strategies led to significant underestimation of false positive protein identifications. Unipept software provided the highest sensitivity and specificity in taxonomic annotation of the identified peptides of unknown origin. Comparison of matching metaproteome and metagenome data revealed a positive correlation between protein and gene abundances. Notably, nearly all functional categories of detected protein groups were differentially abundant in the metaproteome compared to what would be expected from the metagenome, highlighting the need to perform metaproteomics when studying complex microbiome samples.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaBacterial ProteinsCohort StudiesFecesMaleMass SpectrometryMetagenomeMiceProteomicsWorkflowBacterial Proteinsmass spectrometryMetaproteomicsmicrobiomeMus musculusproteogenomics

Identifiers

PMID34763597
PMCPMC8726736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.