Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34763146›Full record

ArticleComputerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society2021

DenResCov-19: A deep transfer learning network for robust automatic classification of COVID-19, pneumonia, and tuberculosis from X-rays.

Michail Mamalakis, Andrew J Swift, Bart Vorselaars, Surajit Ray, Simonne Weeks, Weiping Ding, Richard H Clayton, Louise S Mackenzie, Abhirup Banerjee

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michail MamalakisDepartment of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Insigneo Institute for in-silico Medicine, Sheffield, UK. Electronic address: mmamalakis1@sheffield.ac.uk.
Andrew J SwiftInsigneo Institute for in-silico Medicine, Sheffield, UK; Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Bart VorselaarsSchool of Mathematics and Physics, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK.
Surajit RaySchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QW, UK.
Simonne WeeksSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK.
Weiping DingSchool of Information Science and Technology, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China.
Richard H ClaytonDepartment of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Insigneo Institute for in-silico Medicine, Sheffield, UK.
Louise S MackenzieSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK.
Abhirup BanerjeeDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK. Electronic address: abhirup.banerjee@cardiov.ox.ac.uk.
University of Brighton · GBNantong University · CNUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Lincoln · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is continuing to have a significant effect on the well-being of the global population, thus increasing the demand for rapid testing, diagnosis, and treatment. As COVID-19 can cause severe pneumonia, early diagnosis is essential for correct treatment, as well as to reduce the stress on the healthcare system. Along with COVID-19, other etiologies of pneumonia and Tuberculosis (TB) constitute additional challenges to the medical system. Pneumonia (viral as well as bacterial) kills about 2 million infants every year and is consistently estimated as one of the most important factor of childhood mortality (according to the World Health Organization). Chest X-ray (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) scans are the primary imaging modalities for diagnosing respiratory diseases. Although CT scans are the gold standard, they are more expensive, time consuming, and are associated with a small but significant dose of radiation. Hence, CXR have become more widespread as a first line investigation. In this regard, the objective of this work is to develop a new deep transfer learning pipeline, named DenResCov-19, to diagnose patients with COVID-19, pneumonia, TB or healthy based on CXR images. The pipeline consists of the existing DenseNet-121 and the ResNet-50 networks. Since the DenseNet and ResNet have orthogonal performances in some instances, in the proposed model we have created an extra layer with convolutional neural network (CNN) blocks to join these two models together to establish superior performance as compared to the two individual networks. This strategy can be applied universally in cases where two competing networks are observed. We have tested the performance of our proposed network on two-class (pneumonia and healthy), three-class (COVID-19 positive, healthy, and pneumonia), as well as four-class (COVID-19 positive, healthy, TB, and pneumonia) classification problems. We have validated that our proposed network has been able to successfully classify these lung-diseases on our four datasets and this is one of our novel findings. In particular, the AUC-ROC are 99.60, 96.51, 93.70, 96.40% and the F1 values are 98.21, 87.29, 76.09, 83.17% on our Dataset X-Ray 1, 2, 3, and 4 (DXR1, DXR2, DXR3, DXR4), respectively.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningPneumoniaTuberculosisAlgorithmsHumansSARS-CoV-2X-RaysAutomatic classificationChest X-raysCOVID-19Deep transfer learning networkPneumoniaTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID34763146
PMCPMC8539634
OpenAlexW3152713998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.