SynthesisClinical psychology review2021
Practices for monitoring and responding to incoming data on self-injurious thoughts and behaviors in intensive longitudinal studies: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Clinical psychology review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment Procedures of Self-Harm (With and Without Suicidal Intent) Studies in Adolescents and Young Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Pooled it
- Emotion Differentiation and Dynamics Predicting Suicide Outcomes in High-Risk Adults.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2026Article
- Suicide Risk Management in Ecological Momentary Assessment: Participant Concealment of Suicidal Thoughts and Experiences with Safety Procedures.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
- Initial Development of a Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test for Intensive Longitudinal Assessment of Suicide Risk: Development and Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Ethical considerations for the use of ecological momentary assessment in non-suicidal self-injury research.Ethics & behavior · 2025Article
- Article
- Automated Real-Time Tool for Promoting Crisis Resource Use for Suicide Risk (ResourceBot): Development and Usability Study.JMIR mental health · 2024Article
- Examination of Acceptability, Feasibility, and Iatrogenic Effects of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) of Suicidal Ideation.Assessment · 2024Article
- Characteristics of surveillance systems for suicide and self-harm: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Intervening on high-risk responses during ecological momentary assessment of suicidal thoughts: Is there an effect on study data?Psychological assessment · 2024Article
- The use of advanced technology and statistical methods to predict and prevent suicide.Nature reviews psychology · 2023Article
- The feasibility and acceptability of using smartphones to assess suicide risk among Spanish-speaking adult outpatients.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2022Article
- Measuring Adolescents' Self-injurious Thoughts and Behaviors: Comparing Ecological Momentary Assessment to a Traditional Interview.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2022Article
- Dynamic Regulatory Processes in the Transition From Suicidal Ideation to Action in Adults Leaving Inpatient Psychiatric Care: Protocol for an Intensive Longitudinal Study.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions for Suicide Prevention: Promise, Challenges, and Future Directions.Psychiatry · 2022Review
- Study Protocol for an Ecological Momentary Assessment Study: TempRes "Temporal Variability of Risk and Resilience Factors for Suicidal Ideation".Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Identifying Causal Risk Factors for Self-Harm Among Adolescents With U.S. Child Protective Services Contact.Archives of suicide research : official journal of the International Academy for Suicide ResearchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in the understanding and prevention of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs) are urgently needed. Intensive longitudinal data collection methods-such as ecological momentary assessment-capture fine-grained, "real-world" information about SITBs as they occur and thus have the potential to narrow this gap. However, collecting real-time data on SITBs presents complex ethical and practical considerations, including about whether and how to monitor and respond to incoming information about SITBs from suicidal or self-injuring individuals during the study. We conducted a systematic review of protocols for monitoring and responding to incoming data in previous and ongoing intensive longitudinal studies of SITBs. Across the 61 included unique studies/samples, there was no clear most common approach to managing these ethical and safety considerations. For example, studies were fairly evenly split between either using automated notifications triggered by specific survey responses (e.g., indicating current suicide risk) or monitoring and intervening upon (generally with a phone-based risk assessment) incoming responses (36%), using both automated notifications and monitoring/intervening (35%), or neither using automated notifications nor monitoring/intervening (29%). Certain study characteristics appeared to influence the safety practices used. Future research that systematically evaluates optimal, feasible strategies for managing risk in real-time monitoring research on SITBs is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.