Trial reportJournal of cardiac failure2022
Randomized Controlled Trial of a Cognitive Intervention to Improve Memory in Heart Failure.
Trial report in Journal of cardiac failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03035565 (Cognitive Intervention to Improve Memory in Heart Failure Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cognitive Intervention to Improve Memory in Heart Failure Patients
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Computerized Cognitive Training on Default Mode Network Connectivity in Subjects at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease: A 78-week Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2023Trial
- Computerized Games versus Crosswords Training in Mild Cognitive Impairment.NEJM evidence · 2022Trial
- A secondary analysis of how changes in pain interference relate to changes in health-related quality of life and physical function in heart failure.Heart & lung : the journal of critical careTrial
- Evaluating depressive symptoms, BDNF Val66Met, and APOE-ε4 as moderators of response to computerized cognitive training in heart failure.Heart & lung : the journal of critical careTrial
- A Virtual Reality-Based Cognitive Restorative Intervention Using Nature to Improve Attention, Self-Care, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Heart Failure.The Journal of cardiovascular nursingTrial
- Computerized Cognitive Training and 24-Month Mortality in Heart Failure.The Journal of cardiovascular nursingTrial
- Cognitive Training Intervention Adherence in Older Women with Cardiovascular Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the MindMoves Trial.The Journal of cardiovascular nursingTrial
- Circulating Myokines as Novel Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Diseases.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Atrial Fibrillation and Older Age Predict Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Levels Among Patients With Heart Failure.The Journal of cardiovascular nursingArticle
- Association of Heart Failure With Cognitive Decline and Development of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.The Journal of cardiovascular nursingArticle
- Crossword puzzle training and neuroplasticity in mild cognitive impairment (COGIT-2): 78-week, multi-site, randomized controlled trial with cognitive, functional, imaging and biomarker outcomes.International journal of clinical trialsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this 3-arm randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of computerized cognitive training (CCT) in improving primary outcomes of delayed-recall memory and serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels; and the secondary outcomes were working memory, instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS AND
resultsPatients (n = 256) were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of CCT using BrainHQ, computerized crossword puzzles active control intervention, and usual care. All patients received weekly nurse-enhancement interventions. Data were collected at enrollment and baseline visits and at 10 weeks and 4 and 8 months. In mixed effects models, there were no statistically significant group or group-by-time differences in outcomes. There were statistically significant differences over time in all outcomes in all groups. Patients improved over time on measures of delayed-recall memory, working memory, IADLs, and HRQL and had decreased serum BDNF.
conclusionsCCT did not improve outcomes compared with the active control intervention and usual care. Nurse-enhancement interventions may have led to improved outcomes over time. Future studies are needed to test nurse-enhancement interventions in combination with other cognitive interventions to improve memory in persons with HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.