Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34762965›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2022

Mammography adherence in relation to function-related indicators in older women.

Dongyu Zhang, Linn Abraham, Brian L Sprague, Tracy Onega, Shailesh Advani, Joshua Demb, Diana L Miglioretti, Louise M Henderson, Karen J Wernli, Louise C Walter and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Dongyu ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Linn AbrahamKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Brian L SpragueDepartment of Surgery, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, United States of America.
Tracy OnegaDepartment of Population Health Sciences and the Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Shailesh AdvaniDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC, United States of America.
Joshua DembDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Diana L MigliorettiKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America.
Louise M HendersonDepartment of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Karen J WernliKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Louise C WalterDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Karla KerlikowskeDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
John T SchousboePark Nicollet Clinic and HealthPartners Institute, HealthPartners Inc, Bloomington, MN, United States of America; Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Elizabeth ChrischillesDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America.
Dejana BraithwaiteDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida. Electronic address: dbraithwaite@ufl.edu.
Ellen S O'MearaKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America. Electronic address: Ellen.S.O'Meara@kp.org.
Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Florida · USGeorgetown University · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · USPark Nicollet Clinic · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Christopher K Laubenthal · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Risk-based Imaging Strategies to Improve Breast Cancer Surveillance OutcomesP01CA154292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KARLA M KERLIKOWSKE · 2011 to 2026
$52.9M
Vermont Screening Process Documentation UnitU54CA163303 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI SPRAGUE, BRIAN L · 2011 to 2017
$6.4M
Effectiveness of Pre-Operative MRI in Breast Cancer Surgery and OutcomesR01CA149365 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI ONEGA, TRACY · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
COMORBIDITY AND SCREENING OUTCOMES AMONG OLDER WOMEN UNDERGOING MAMMOGRAPHYR01CA207361 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BRAITHWAITE, DEJANA K · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA154292NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149365NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207361NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior studies of screening mammography patterns by functional status in older women show inconsistent results. We used Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium-Medicare linked data (1999-2014) to investigate the association of functional limitations with adherence to screening mammography in 145,478 women aged 66-74 years. Functional limitation was represented by a claims-based function-related indicator (FRI) score which incorporated 16 items reflecting functional status. Baseline adherence was defined as mammography utilization 9-30 months after the index screening mammography. Longitudinal adherence was examined among women adherent at baseline and defined as time from the index mammography to end of the first 30-month gap in mammography. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate baseline and longitudinal adherence, respectively. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age (66-70 vs. 71-74 years). Overall, 69.6% of participants had no substantial functional limitation (FRI score 0), 23.5% had some substantial limitations (FRI score 1), and 6.8% had serious limitations (FRI score ≥ 2). Mean age at baseline was 68.5 years (SD = 2.6), 85.3% of participants were white, and 77.1% were adherent to screening mammography at baseline. Women with a higher FRI score were more likely to be non-adherent at baseline (FRI ≥ 2 vs. 0: aOR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.20, p-trend < 0.01). Similarly, a higher FRI score was associated with longitudinal non-adherence (FRI ≥ 2 vs. 0: aHR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.22, p-trend < 0.01). Effect measures of FRI did not differ substantially by age categories. Older women with a higher burden of functional limitations are less likely to be adherent to screening mammography recommendations.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammographyAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMass ScreeningMedicareUnited StatesBreast cancer screeningEpidemiologyFunctional limitationGerontologyMammography

Identifiers

PMID34762965
PMCPMC8724400
OpenAlexW3212904139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.