Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34762964›Full record

SynthesisPreventive medicine2022

Aspirin use for cancer prevention: A systematic review of public, patient and healthcare provider attitudes and adherence behaviours.

Kelly E Lloyd, Louise H Hall, Natalie King, Rachael J Thorneloe, Rocio Rodriguez-Lopez, Lucy Ziegler, David G Taylor, Mairead MacKenzie, Samuel G Smith, AsCaP Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Preventive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Role of Proinflammatory Biomarkers in Oral Cancer Pathophysiology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly E LloydLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: umkel@leeds.ac.uk.
Louise H HallLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Natalie KingLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Rachael J ThorneloeCentre for Behavioural Science & Applied Psychology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Rocio Rodriguez-LopezLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Lucy ZieglerLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
David G TaylorSchool of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.
Mairead MacKenzieIndependent Cancer Patients' Voice, UK.
Samuel G SmithLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
AsCaP Group
University of Leeds · GBSheffield Hallam University · GBThe Patients Association · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 24991Cancer Research UK C569/A24991Department of Health NIHR300588
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We undertook a systematic review to synthesise the data on attitudes and behaviour towards the use of aspirin for cancer prevention, and healthcare providers' attitudes towards implementing aspirin in practice. Searches were carried out across 12 databases (e.g. MEDLINE, EMBASE). We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to evaluate study quality, and conducted a narrative synthesis of the data. The review was pre-registered (PROSPERO: CRD42018093453). Thirty-eight studies were identified. Uptake and adherence data were all from trials. Trials recruited healthy participants, those at higher risk of cancer, and those with cancer. Four studies reported moderate to high (40.9-77.7%) uptake to an aspirin trial among people who were eligible. Most trials (18/22) reported high day-to-day adherence (≥80%). Three trials observed no association between gender and adherence. One trial found no association between adherence and colorectal cancer risk. Three studies reported moderate to high (43.6-76.0%) hypothetical willingness to use aspirin. Two studies found that a high proportion of healthcare providers (72.0-76.0%) perceived aspirin to be a suitable cancer prevention option. No qualitative studies were identified. The likelihood that eligible users of aspirin would participate in a trial evaluating the use of aspirin for preventive therapy was moderate to high. Among participants in a trial, day-to-day adherence was high. Further research is needed to identify uptake and adherence rates in routine care, the factors affecting aspirin use, and the barriers to implementing aspirin into clinical care.

Indexed as

AspirinNeoplasmsAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelHumansAspirinAspirinChemopreventionDecision-makingNSAIDPreventive therapy

Identifiers

PMID34762964
PMCPMC8803547
OpenAlexW3165749124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.