ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2022
Measurement of the Lid Margin Thickness in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction with Vernier Micrometer.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of the disposable eyelid warming masks in the treatment of dry eye disease due to Meibomian gland dysfunction.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Trial
- Association of Eyelid Margin Thickness and Meibography in Dogs With Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Comparison of Intense Pulsed Light Treatments including Upper Lid or Lateral Canthus in Patients of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Application of optical coherence tomography and keratograph in the measurements of lower lid margin thickness.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTo investigate the lid margin thickness (LMT) from the posterior lash line to the mucocutaneous junction at the middle position in adults with and without meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) by vernier micrometer (VM).
methodsThis is a cross-sectional, observational study. A hundred eyes from 100 volunteers aged 20 to 79, including 56 normal participants and 44 participants with MGD, were recruited. Measurements of the LMT by VM were performed by the same person.
resultsThe mean age of 56 normal subjects (24 males and 32 females) and 44 MGD subjects (16 males and 28 females) was 40.0 ± 13.2 years and 42.7 ± 17.1 years, respectively. There was a significant difference in the upper LMT between normal and MGD subjects (1.36 ± 0.25 vs. 1.60 ± 0.27 mm, P < 0.001), but not in the lower LMT (1.0 ± 0.23 vs. 1.10 ± 0.28 mm, P = 0.07). In both normal and MGD subjects, the upper or lower LMT was significantly positively correlated with age (P < 0.05), and the upper LMT was greater than the lower LMT (P < 0.001). In addition, the lower LMT in MGD subjects was significantly positively correlated with meibum expressibility (r
conclusionsThe LMT was closely related to age and could be an important indicator for detecting MGD. Furthermore, we found that the upper LMT was greater than the lower LMT, and the lower LMT in MGD subjects seemed to be related to meibum expressibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.