Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34762201›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2022

Response to first-line chemotherapy regimen is associated with efficacy of ımmune checkpoint blockade therapies in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Deniz Tural, Fatih Selçukbiricik, Ömer Fatih Ölmez, Ahmet Taner Sümbül, Mustafa Erman, Hasan Şenol Coşkun, Mehmet Artaç, Saadettin Kılıçkap

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Deniz TuralDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Zuhuratbaba District, Tevfik Saglam St. No: 11, Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey. deniztural@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2144-6469
Fatih SelçukbiricikMedical Oncology, Koc University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ömer Fatih ÖlmezMedical Oncology, Medipol University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet Taner SümbülMedical Oncology, Baskent University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey.
Mustafa ErmanMedical Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey.
Hasan Şenol CoşkunMedical Oncology, Akdeniz University Medical Faculty, Antalya, Turkey.
Mehmet ArtaçMedical Oncology, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty, Konya, Turkey.
Saadettin KılıçkapMedical Oncology, Liv Hospital, Istinye Universty, Ankara, Turkey.
Akdeniz University · TRBakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRBaşkent University · TRHacettepe University · TRIstanbul Medipol University · TRKoç University · TRLiv Hospital · TRNecmettin Erbakan University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtezolizumab (ATZ) has demonstrated antitumor activity in previous studies in patients with metastatic platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma. However, the response rate of ATZ was modest. Therefore, finding biologic or clinical biomarkers that could help to select patients who respond to the immune checkpoint blockade remains important. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this study, we present the retrospective analysis of 105 patients with urothelial cancer treated with ATZ after progression on first-line chemotherapy. Data of patients were obtained from patient files and hospital records. The association between response to first-line chemotherapy and ATZ was using Fisher's exact test. Median follow-up was calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. OS was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsThe median follow-up time was 23.5 months. Forty (74.1%) of patients who experienced clinical benefit after firs-line chemotherapy also had clinical benefit after atezolizumab, while only 14 (25.9%) of patients with initial PD after first-line chemotherapy subsequently experienced clinical benefit with ATZ (p = 0.001). The median OS on ATZ of 14.8 and 3.4 months for patients with clinical benefit and progressive disease in response to first-line chemotherapy, respectively (p = 0.001). Three of the adverse prognostic factors according to the Bellmunt criteria were independent factors of short survival: liver metastases {Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.9; p = 0.04}, ECOG PS ≥ 1 (HR = 2.7; p = 0.001), and Hemoglobin level below 10 mg/dl (HR = 2.8; p < 0.001). In addition, patients with clinical benefit from first-line chemotherapy (HR = 0.39; p < 0.001) maintained a significant association with OS in multivariate analysis.

conclusionsOur study demonstrated that clinical benefit from first-line chemotherapy was independent prognostic factors on OS in patients' use of ATZ as second-line treatment in metastatic bladder cancer. Furthermore, these findings are important for stratification factors for future immunotherapy study design in patients with bladder cancer who have progressed after first-line chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsRetrospective StudiesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAtezolizumabBladder cancerChemotherapyImmunotherapyOutcomesUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID34762201
OpenAlexW3203151826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.