Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34762152›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2022

Modelling concrete and abstract concepts using brain-constrained deep neural networks.

Malte R Henningsen-Schomers, Friedemann Pulvermüller

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Abstract concepts and simulated competition.Psychological research · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Influence of language on perception and concept formation in a brain-constrained deep neural network model.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Malte R Henningsen-SchomersDepartment of Philosophy of Humanities, Brain Language Laboratory, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195, Berlin, Germany. malte2011@cantab.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4506-1697
Friedemann PulvermüllerDepartment of Philosophy of Humanities, Brain Language Laboratory, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3210-7112

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC 2025/1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Pu 97/22-1H2020 European Research Council ERC-2019-ADG 883811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A neurobiologically constrained deep neural network mimicking cortical area function relevant for sensorimotor, linguistic and conceptual processing was used to investigate the putative biological mechanisms underlying conceptual category formation and semantic feature extraction. Networks were trained to learn neural patterns representing specific objects and actions relevant to semantically 'ground' concrete and abstract concepts. Grounding sets consisted of three grounding patterns with neurons representing specific perceptual or action-related features; neurons were either unique to one pattern or shared between patterns of the same set. Concrete categories were modelled as pattern triplets overlapping in their 'shared neurons', thus implementing semantic feature sharing of all instances of a category. In contrast, abstract concepts had partially shared feature neurons common to only pairs of category instances, thus, exhibiting family resemblance, but lacking full feature overlap. Stimulation with concrete and abstract conceptual patterns and biologically realistic unsupervised learning caused formation of strongly connected cell assemblies (CAs) specific to individual grounding patterns, whose neurons were spread out across all areas of the deep network. After learning, the shared neurons of the instances of concrete concepts were more prominent in central areas when compared with peripheral sensorimotor ones, whereas for abstract concepts the converse pattern of results was observed, with central areas exhibiting relatively fewer neurons shared between pairs of category members. We interpret these results in light of the current knowledge about the relative difficulty children show when learning abstract words. Implications for future neurocomputational modelling experiments as well as neurobiological theories of semantic representation are discussed.

Indexed as

BrainConcept FormationChildHumansKnowledgeNeural Networks, ComputerSemantics

Identifiers

PMID34762152
PMCPMC9674741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.