Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34762100›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2022

Changes in Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Relative to the Revised US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation on Prostate Cancer Screening.

Michael S Leapman, Rong Wang, Henry Park, James B Yu, Preston C Sprenkle, Matthew R Cooperberg, Cary P Gross, Xiaomei Ma

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prostate Cancer Mortality Trend in Montenegro 1990-2018.Iranian journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael S LeapmanDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Rong WangYale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Henry ParkYale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
James B YuYale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Preston C SprenkleDepartment of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Matthew R CooperbergDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Cary P GrossYale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Xiaomei MaYale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Yale University · USYale Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Understanding the Adoption and Impact of New Risk Assessment Technologies in Prostate Cancer CareK08CA237872 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LEAPMAN, MICHAEL STUART · 2019 to 2023
$1.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS K08 CA237872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceIn April 2017, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) published a draft guideline that reversed its 2012 guidance advising against prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer in all men (grade D), instead endorsing individual decision-making for men aged 55 to 69 years (grade C).

objectiveTo evaluate changes in rates of PSA testing after revisions in the USPSTF guideline on prostate cancer screening. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis retrospective cohort study used deidentified claims data from Blue Cross Blue Shield beneficiaries aged 40 to 89 years from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2019. EXPOSURES: Publication of the USPSTF's draft (April 2017) and final (May 2018) recommendation on prostate cancer screening. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Age-adjusted rates of PSA testing in bimonthly periods were calculated, and PSA testing rates from calendar years before (January 1 to December 31, 2016) and after (January 1 to December 31, 2019) the guideline change were compared. Interrupted time series analyses were used to evaluate the association of the draft (April 2017) and published (May 2018) USPSTF guideline with rates of PSA testing. Changes in rates of PSA testing were further evaluated among beneficiaries within the age categories reflected in the guideline: 40 to 54 years, 55 to 69 years, and 70 to 89 years.

resultsThe median number of eligible beneficiaries for each bimonthly period was 8 087 565 (range, 6 407 602-8 747 308), and the median age of all included eligible beneficiaries was 53 years (IQR, 47-59 years). Between 2016 and 2019, the mean (SD) rate of PSA testing increased from 32.5 (1.1) to 36.5 (1.1) tests per 100 person-years, a relative increase of 12.5% (95% CI, 1.1%-24.4%). During the same period, mean (SD) rates of PSA testing increased from 20.6 (0.8) to 22.7 (0.9) tests per 100 person-years among men aged 40 to 54 years (relative increase, 10.1%; 95% CI, -2.8% to 23.7%), from 49.8 (1.9) to 55.8 (1.8) tests per 100 person-years among men aged 55 to 69 years (relative increase, 12.1%; 95% CI, -0.2% to 25.2%), and from 38.0 (1.4) to 44.2 (1.4) tests per 100 person-years among men aged 70 to 89 years (relative increase, 16.2%; 95% CI, 4.2%-29.0%). Interrupted time series analysis revealed a significantly increasing trend of PSA testing after April 2017 among all beneficiaries (0.30 tests per 100 person-years for each bimonthly period; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This large national cohort study found that rates of PSA testing increased after the USPSTF's draft statement in 2017, reversing trends seen after earlier guidance against PSA testing for all patients. Increased testing was also observed among older men, who may be less likely to benefit from prostate cancer screening.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID34762100
PMCPMC8587214
OpenAlexW3213638408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.