Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34762038›Full record

ArticleJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2021

More Reasons, More Use and Problems? Examining the Influence of Number of Motives on Consumption and Consequences Across Alcohol-Only, Cannabis-Only, and Simultaneous-Use Days.

Angela K Stevens, Megan M Drohan, Holly K Boyle, Helene R White, Kristina M Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Day-level latent classes of alcohol and cannabis use motives: Associations by combined use, level of use, and consequences.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angela K StevensCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Megan M DrohanDepartment of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island.
Holly K BoyleCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Helene R WhiteCenter of Alcohol and Substance Use Studies, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey.
Kristina M JacksonCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

Funding

Substance Abuse Intervention/Outcome Research TrainingT32DA016184 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Damaris J. Rohsenow, JENNIFER W. TIDEY · 2003 to 2026
$6.1M
Motivational and Contextual Influences on Patterns of Simultaneous Alcohol and Marijuana Use: A Daily Assessment StudyR01DA040880 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, KRISTINA MELIA, WHITE, HELENE R. · 2016 to 2018
$2.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040880NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA016184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlcohol and cannabis use as well as their simultaneous use are common among U.S. college students. Reasons for use are proximal predictors of consumption and consequences. Little research has examined possible adverse effects of endorsing multiple motives on a given use day. We examined the effects of the number of motives on consumption and negative consequences for alcohol-only, cannabis-only, and simultaneous-use days.

methodCollege students (

resultsAcross models, endorsing more motives than typical on a given use day (within person) and more motives in general (between person) was related to greater alcohol and cannabis consumption. Endorsing more alcohol-only motives and cannabis-only motives than typical resulted in greater odds of experiencing a negative consequence when accounting for consumption. This within-person effect was not statistically significant for simultaneous-use motives/consequences. Endorsing a greater number of motives across the study (i.e., between person) was not significantly related to consequences beyond consumption.

conclusionsResearch has documented the robust effects of specific motives on substance use outcomes. Our novel findings extend this work by demonstrating the risks associated with endorsing multiple motives on a given use day. In addition to motive type, we recommend that the number of motives endorsed on a given day be considered as a potential risk factor to be targeted to reduce harms associated with substance use.

Indexed as

CannabisAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAlcohol DrinkingFemaleHumansMaleMotivationStudentsUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34762038
PMCPMC8819619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.