ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2021
Improving research ethics review and governance can improve human health.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early-Career Nurse Researchers' Perspectives on Research Ethics Review in China: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.International nursing review · 2026Article
- From the ICU Bedside: Applying the Transnational Clinical Academic Doctorate Lens to a Clinically Embedded PhD Journey.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Review
- Approval delays in multi-country COVID-19 trials: the case of COPCOV and the risk of therapeutic inertia.Trials · 2025Article
- Developing healthy attitudes to evidence through the Health Determinants Research Collaborations (HDRCs).Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Consideration of Sustainability When Approving Human Medical Research-A Scoping Review.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2025Article
- Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Views, and Perceptions of the Roles and Functions of Research Ethics Committees: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Public attitudes towards social media field experiments.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Optimizing clinical nutrition research: the role of adaptive and pragmatic trials.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2023Review
- Single research ethics committee review for multinational trials is a misconception.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2022Article
- Prioritising health and wellbeing: the hope we cling to in 2021.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2021Article
- Protecting the public from the adverse effects of confused research ethics.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.