Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34761838›Full record

ArticleBioFactors (Oxford, England)2022

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is not related to carotid atherosclerosis progression and cardiovascular events in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Results from the IMPROVE study.

Massimo R Mannarino, Vanessa Bianconi, Bruna Gigante, Rona J Strawbridge, Kai Savonen, Sudhir Kurl, Philippe Giral, Andries Smit, Per Eriksson, Elena Tremoli and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioFactors (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Massimo R MannarinoUnit of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4694-5504
Vanessa BianconiUnit of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Bruna GiganteDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rona J StrawbridgeDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kai SavonenFoundation for Research in Health Exercise and Nutrition, Kuopio & Research Institute of Exercise Medicine, Kuopio, Finland.
Sudhir KurlInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Philippe GiralAssistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Andries SmitDepartment of Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Per ErikssonDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Elena TremoliMaria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, (RA), Italy.
Fabrizio VegliaCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Damiano BaldassarreCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2766-8882
Matteo PirroUnit of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5527-4821
IMPROVE study group
Karolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Perugia · ITAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentro Cardiologico Monzino · ITKuopio University Hospital · FIMaria Cecilia Hospital · ITUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

European Commission Fifth Framework Programme QLG1-CMedical Research Council MR/S003061/1Ministero della Salute 2634520Ministero della Salute 2755475Ministero della Salute RC2018 MMP4.9 IDMinistero della Salute RC2019 MPP 4D ID
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammation is a component of the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and is associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a possible inflammation metric for the detection of ASCVD risk, although results of prospective studies are highly inconsistent on this topic. We investigated the cross-sectional relationship between NLR and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) in subjects at moderate-to-high ASCVD risk. The prospective association between NLR, cIMT progression, and incident vascular events (VEs) was also explored. In 3341 subjects from the IMT-Progression as Predictors of VEs (IMPROVE) study, we analyzed the association between NLR, cIMT, and its 15-month progression. The association between NLR and incident VEs was also investigated. NLR was positively associated with cross-sectional measures of cIMT, but not with cIMT progression. The association between NLR and cross-sectional cIMT measures was abolished when adjusted for confounders. No association was found between NRL and incident VEs. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the hazard ratios (HRs) of VEs across NLR quartiles. NLR was neither associated with the presence and progression of carotid atherosclerosis, nor with the risk of VEs. Our findings do not support the role of NLR as a predictor of the risk of atherosclerosis progression and ASCVD events in subjects at moderate-to-high ASCVD risk, in primary prevention. However, the usefulness of NLR for patients at a different level of ASCVD risk cannot be inferred from this study.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCarotid Artery DiseasesCarotid Intima-Media ThicknessHumansLymphocytesNeutrophilsPrimary PreventionProspective StudiesRisk FactorscardiovascularcarotidIMTlymphocyteneutrophilNLRprospective

Identifiers

PMID34761838
PMCPMC9299016
OpenAlexW3212359647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.