Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34761815›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2022

Olivocochlear projections contribute to superior intensity coding in cochlear nucleus small cells.

Adam Hockley, Calvin Wu, Susan E Shore

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fast Inhibition Slows and Desynchronizes Mouse Auditory Efferent Neuron Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adam HockleyDepartment of Otolaryngology, Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Calvin WuDepartment of Otolaryngology, Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2622-0576
Susan E ShoreDepartment of Otolaryngology, Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5300-5492
Kresge Eye Institute · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Sensory Mechanisms and Disorders - Administrative SupplementT32DC000011 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Michael Thomas Roberts · 1989 to 2026
$9.5M
Hidden Hearing Loss: A View from the BrainR01DC017119 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHORE, SUSAN E · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017119NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding communication signals, especially in noisy environments, is crucial to social interactions. Yet, as we age, acoustic signals can be disrupted by cochlear damage and the subsequent auditory nerve fibre degeneration. The most vulnerable medium- and high-threshold-auditory nerve fibres innervate various cell types in the cochlear nucleus, among which the small cells are unique in receiving this input exclusively. Furthermore, small cells project to medial olivocochlear (MOC) neurons, which in turn send branched collaterals back into the small cell cap. Here, we use single-unit recordings to characterise small cell firing characteristics and demonstrate superior intensity coding in this cell class. We show converse effects when activating/blocking the MOC system, demonstrating that small-cell unique coding properties are facilitated by direct cholinergic input from the MOC system. Small cells also maintain tone-level coding in the presence of background noise. Finally, small cells precisely code low-frequency modulation more accurately than other ventral cochlear nucleus cell types, demonstrating accurate envelope coding that may be important for vocalisation processing. These results highlight the small cell olivocochlear circuit as a key player in signal processing in noisy environments, which may be selectively degraded in ageing or after noise insult. KEY POINTS: Cochlear nucleus small cells receive input from low/medium spontaneous rate auditory nerve fibres and medial olivocochlear neurons. Electrical stimulation of medial olivocochlear neurons in the ventral nucleus of the trapezoid body and blocking cholinergic input to small cells using atropine demonstrates an excitatory cholinergic input to small cells, which increases responses to suprathreshold sound. Unique inputs to small cells produce superior sound intensity coding. This coding of intensity is preserved in the presence of background noise, an effect exclusive to this cell type in the cochlear nucleus. These results suggest that small cells serve an essential function in the ascending auditory system, which may be relevant to disorders such as hidden hearing loss.

Indexed as

Cochlear NucleusTrapezoid BodyAcoustic StimulationCochleaCochlear NerveOlivary Nucleuscochlear nucleusintensity codingolivocochlearsmall cell cap

Identifiers

PMID34761815
PMCPMC9067393
OpenAlexW3212261036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.