ArticleAnnals of medicine2021
Predicting mortality in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis patients using distance-saturation product.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of clinical characteristics and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid microbial community diversity in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis patients withMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Mucus plugging, disease severity and sputum myeloperoxidase concentration in bronchiectasis.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- IL-6 and TIMP-1 Correlated to Airway Pathogen Colonization and Predict Disease Severity in Patients with Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Predicting mortality in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis patients using distance-saturation product.Annals of medicine · 2021Article
- Small airway dysfunction in bronchiectasis patients with exercise-induced desaturation.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseArticle
- Risk factors for mortality in Finnish bronchiectasis patients: A four-year study.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe bronchiectasis severity index (BSI) and FACED score are currently used in predicting outcomes of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB). Distance-saturation product (DSP), the product of distance walked, and lowest oxygen saturation during the 6-min walk test showed strong predictive power of mortality in non-CF bronchiectasis patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of these scores and DSP in predicting mortality. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Our retrospective study included NCFB patients from January 2004 to December 2017. We recorded the basic data, pulmonary function, radiologic studies, sputum culture results, acute exacerbations (AE), emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalization, and mortality.
resultsA total 130 NCFB patients were analysed. The mean BSI score, FACED score, and DSP were 8.8 ± 4.9, 3.4 ± 1.7, and 413.1 ± 101.5 m%, respectively. BSI and FACED scores had comparable predictive power for AE (
conclusionDSP had comparable predictive power for mortality as the well-validated BSI and FACED scores and is relatively easy to use in clinical practice.KEY MESSAGEDistance-saturation product (DSP) comprised with the product of distance walked, and lowest oxygen saturation during the 6-min walk test, which is common used in clinical practice.DSP demonstrated strong and comparable predictive power of mortality as the well-validated BSI and FACED scores in non-CF bronchiectasis patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.