Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34761513›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2022

Consistent practices in pressure ulcer prevention based on international care guidelines: A cross-sectional study.

Elina Haavisto, Minna Stolt, Pauli Puukka, Teija Korhonen, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. [Modeling and comfort analysis of arrayed air cushion mattress for pressure ulcer prevention and assisted repositioning].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elina HaavistoDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Minna StoltDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1845-9800
Pauli PuukkaDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Teija KorhonenSavonia University of Applied Sciences, Kuopio, Finland.
Emilia Kielo-ViljamaaDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3931-1204

Funding

Satakunta Hospital District
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of consistent and evidence-based practices is essential in terms of patient safety and quality of care. The purpose of this study was to describe the use of consistent practices in PU prevention based on international care guidelines and to assess the validity and reliability of the pressure ulcer prevention practice (PUPreP) instrument. The data (n = 554) were collected between 2018 and 2019 from nursing professionals working at two hospital districts in Finland using the PUPreP instrument. The instrument consisted of 42 items assessing participants' perceptions of the frequencies of pressure ulcer prevention practices with the following scale: never, sometimes, often, always. The data were analysed using statistical analysis. According to the results, the use of pressure ulcer prevention practices was more frequently described as often. The most frequently used prevention practice was repositioning, and the least frequently used practice was nutrition. Factors related to nursing professionals' pressure ulcer prevention practices were the working sector, education and working frequency in pressure ulcer prevention, and early identification of pressure ulcers. The study results suggest that the evidence-based pressure ulcer prevention practices were followed at a moderate level by nurses. The PuPreP instrument demonstrated validity and reliability, but further development is needed.

Indexed as

Pressure UlcerCross-Sectional StudiesHumansReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSkin Careevidence-based practicenursingpractice guidelinepressure ulcer

Identifiers

PMID34761513
PMCPMC9284652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.