ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2022
SAXSMoW 3.0: New advances in the determination of the molecular weight of proteins in dilute solutions from SAXS intensity data on a relative scale.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- SASBDB reaches 5000 data sets: empowering open science and next-generation SAS analysis.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Article
- Twists and Turns of Liquid Crystals Unravelled by Small-Angle Scattering.Small methods · 2026Review
- A disulfide redox switch mechanism regulates glycoside hydrolase function.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Crystal structure of coagulation factor XII N-terminal domains 1-5.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2025Article
- Human gingival mesenchymal stem cells-lyosecretome attenuates adverse effect of hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress on osteoblast cells.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2024Article
- Characterization of Surfactant Spheroidal Micelle Structure for Pharmaceutical Applications: A Novel Analytical Framework.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- In Vivo Incorporation of Photoproteins into GroEL Chaperonin Retaining Major Structural and Functional Properties.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Describing small-angle scattering profiles by a limited set of intensities.Journal of applied crystallography · 2022Article
- SAXSMoW 3.0: New advances in the determination of the molecular weight of proteins in dilute solutions from SAXS intensity data on a relative scale.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SAXSMoW (SAXS Molecular Weight) is an online platform widely used over the past few years for determination of molecular weights of proteins in dilute solutions. The scattering intensity retrieved from small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) raw data is the sole input to SAXSMoW for determination of molecular weights of proteins in liquid. The current updated SAXSMoW version 3.0 determines the linear dependence of the true protein volume on their apparent protein volume, based on SAXS curves calculated for 67,000 protein structures selected from the Protein Data Bank. SAXSMoW 3.0 was tested against 43 experimental SAXS scattering curves from proteins with known molecular weights. Our results demonstrate that most of the molecular weights determined for the nonglycosylated and also for the glycosylated proteins are in good agreement with their expected molecular weights. Additionally, the average discrepancies between the calculated molecular weights and their nominal values for glycosylated proteins are similar to those for nonglycosylated ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.