Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34761211›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of thoracic and critical care medicine2021

Expert consensus on the minimum clinical standards of practice for Nigerian physiotherapists working in intensive care units: A modified Delphi study.

I Idris, A W Awotidebe, N B Mukhtar, R N Ativie, J M Nuhu, I C Muhammad, A S Danbatta, R A Adedoyin, J Mohammed

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

I IdrisDepartment of Physiotherapy, General Hospital Gombe, Gombe, Nigeria.
A W AwotidebeDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Bayero University Kano, Kano, Nigeria.
N B MukhtarDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Bayero University Kano, Kano, Nigeria.
R N AtivieDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
J M NuhuDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Bayero University Kano, Kano, Nigeria.
I C MuhammadDepartment of Physiotherapy, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria.
A S DanbattaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.
R A AdedoyinDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
J MohammedDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Bayero University Kano, Kano, Nigeria.
Bayero University Kano · NGAminu Kano Teaching Hospital · NGGombe State University · NGObafemi Awolowo University · NGUniversity of Nigeria · NGUsmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) needs staff with a recommended level of expertise and experience owing to the life-threatening nature of illnesses, injuries and complications that these patients present with. There are no specific guidelines governing physiotherapy practice in ICUs in Nigeria. Hence, there is a need to have expert consensus on the minimum clinical standard of practice for physiotherapists working in ICUs as a first step to proposing/developing guidelines in the future.

objectivesTo assess the expert consensus on the minimum clinical standard of practice for physiotherapists working in ICUs in Nigeria.

methodsPhysiotherapists with working experience in Nigerian ICUs were purposively recruited into the present study using a modified Delphi technique. A questionnaire comprising 222 question items on the role of physiotherapy in critical care was adopted and administered to the participants over three rounds of Delphi procedure (online). Participants checked either 'essential', 'not essential' or 'unsure' for each question item. For each question item to be considered 'essential' or 'not essential', a consensus agreement ≥70% had to be met. Questions without consensus were further modified by providing definition or clarification and presented in subsequent rounds. Data were analysed descriptively.

resultsWe recruited 26 expert physiotherapists who consented to the study and completed the first round of the study. The majority of the physiotherapists (

conclusionExpert consensus was achieved for a substantial number of question items regarding knowledge and skills for assessment, condition and treatment items of the questionnaire by experienced critical care physiotherapists in Nigeria.

Indexed as

critical care physiotherapyDelphi techniqueexpert consensusstandards of practice

Identifiers

PMID34761211
PMCPMC8573816
OpenAlexW3205844137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.