ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2021
Perampanel during pregnancy: Description of four cases.
Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Third generation antiseizure medications exposure during pregnancy and neonatal adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review.Science progressPooled it
- Placental transfer of third-generation antiepileptic drugs: in vivo lacosamide case study and in vitro investigation of transporter inhibition by lacosamide and perampanel.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026Article
- The broad-spectrum activity of perampanel: state of the art and future perspective of AMPA antagonism beyond epilepsy.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perampanel (PER) is approved in Italy as an adjunctive treatment for focal-onset seizures (FOS) and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCs), and it could be an alternative to valproate in young women diagnosed with idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Nevertheless, clinical data about the outcome of pregnancies in women exposed to PER are lacking. Here, we report retrospectively collected data from four women suffering from FOS who were exposed to PER during pregnancy. Three pregnancies were carried out with PER as add-on therapy during the entire gestation (8 mg/day in two patients and 6 mg/day in one), without seizure frequency variations. The fourth patient started PER 2 mg/day as monotherapy during the 13th week of pregnancy due to seizure relapse and continued it until delivery with complete seizure control. All pregnancies showed good outcomes, and their newborns did not possess major congenital malformations. Apgar scores and auxological parameters at birth were normal. Fetal pathology in follow-up during pregnancies was absent in all cases. In our patients PER was well tolerated and appeared safe for the fetuses and did not result in major malformations or adverse events at birth. Nevertheless, this is a report involving a small number of patients and it does not suggest the general use of PER is safe during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.