ReviewFASEB bioAdvances2021
In vivo imaging of EVs in zebrafish: New perspectives from "the waterside".
Review in FASEB bioAdvances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Lipid nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles: emerging cell free therapeutic platforms for hepatobiliary cancers.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- The Zebrafish as a Model for Ocular Translational Research: From Retinal Repair to Regeneration.Cells · 2025Review
- Nanobody-Decorated Lipid Nanoparticles for Enhanced mRNA Delivery to Tumors In Vivo.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Extracellular Vesicles and Intercellular Communication: Challenges for In Vivo Molecular Imaging and Tracking.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Recent advances in the crosstalk between adipose, muscle and bone tissues in fish.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Migrasomes: From Biogenesis, Release, Uptake, Rupture to Homeostasis and Diseases.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Review
- In vivo imaging of EVs in zebrafish: New perspectives from "the waterside".FASEB bioAdvances · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To harmoniously coordinate the activities of all its different cell types, a multicellular organism critically depends on intercellular communication. One recently discovered mode of intercellular cross-talk is based on the exchange of "extracellular vesicles" (EVs). EVs are nano-sized heterogeneous lipid bilayer vesicles enriched in a variety of biomolecules that mediate short- and long-distance communication between different cells, and between cells and their environment. Numerous studies have demonstrated important aspects pertaining to the dynamics of their release, their uptake, and sub-cellular fate and roles in vitro. However, to demonstrate these and other aspects of EV biology in a relevant, fully physiological context in vivo remains challenging. In this review we analyze the state of the art of EV imaging in vivo, focusing in particular on zebrafish as a promising model to visualize, study, and characterize endogenous EVs in real-time and expand our understanding of EV biology at cellular and systems level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.