ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2021
Effectiveness of ethics case based on blended learning approaches on medical students' learning: A quasi-experimental study.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the effectiveness of case-based and lecture-based learning strategies on the moral knowledge of the nursing staff.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Teaching medical ethics through Ethical Grand Rounds.Korean journal of medical education · 2025Article
- The impact of artificial intelligence-assisted teaching on medical students' learning outcomes: an integrated model based on the ARCS model and constructivist theory.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of a competency-based coordinator of advance care planning competency enhancement program: a mixed method.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of active teaching methods in ethics education, instead of being merely teacher centred, can lead students to problem-solving in a practical way. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of comprehensive medical ethics education based on educational approaches and the effect of this approach on students' learning and moral reasoning skills. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis quasi-experimental intervention study was performed on seventy physiopathology medical students who had taken the medical ethics course. The students' educational program included teaching theoretical concept of medical ethics, discussing ethical cases and clinical reasoning in class, and then discussing in forum environment and individual assignments in the learning management system (LMS) system and completing the portfolio. Student evaluation was associated students' knowledge, attitu de, and moral reasoning skills and learning. A comprehensive program including forum participation, individual assignments in LMS, theory and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) tests, and portfolio completion was used to evaluation of students. The students' learning was compared to students of the previous year, which was conducted through a traditional teacher-centered method. Data analysis was conducted using IBM
resultsThe results showed that there was a significant difference between the mean learning of students compared with traditional class (
conclusionAccording to research findings, it seems that the mentioned model is one of the important and new issues as a suitable method of teaching medical ethics. Furthermore, it can be suitable model in other medical courses. The more research in multicentral may be need to assess other effects on students' learning indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.