Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34760950›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021

Team-Based Care for Improving Hypertension Management: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

Valérie Santschi, Gregoire Wuerzner, Bruno Pais, Arnaud Chiolero, Philippe Schaller, Lyne Cloutier, Gilles Paradis, Michel Burnier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Critical Role of Community Pharmacists in Blood Pressure Monitoring.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Editorial: Women in hypertension.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Valérie SantschiLa Source, School of Nursing Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gregoire WuerznerService of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bruno PaisLa Source, School of Nursing Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Arnaud ChioleroPopulation Health Laboratory, #PopHealthLab, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Philippe SchallerCité Générations, Onex, Switzerland.
Lyne CloutierDépartement des sciences infirmières, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
Gilles ParadisSchool of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Michel BurnierService of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHMcGill University · CAUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières · CAUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

healthcare professionalshealthcare services researchhypertensioninterprofessional interventionteam-based care

Identifiers

PMID34760950
PMCPMC8572997
OpenAlexW3209872678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.