Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34760748›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2021

Agreement between WHO-UMC causality scale and the Naranjo algorithm for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions.

Ajay K Shukla, Ratinder Jhaj, Saurav Misra, Shah N Ahmed, Malaya Nanda, Deepa Chaudhary

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06517823 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of the Fixed-Dose Combination of Etoricoxib/Cyanocobalamin Versus Etoricoxib in the Treatment of Patients with Acute Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V.Ran2024 to 2024Enrolled190ConditionsAcute Low-back PainArmsEtoricoxib + Cyanocobalamin fixed dose, Etoricoxib fixed dose
NCT06863701 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety Study for the Combination of Etoricoxib / Betamethasone Compared to Etoricoxib for the Treatment of Patients Diagnosed With Acute Gout Arthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V.Ran2025 to 2027Enrolled72ConditionsGout Arthritis, Gout AttackArmsEtoricoxib + Betamethasone fixed dose, Etoricoxib fixed dose
NCT06916884 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Confirmatory Study on the Efficacy and Safety of the Fixed-dose Combination of Desloratadine/Betamethasone Versus Desloratadine as Treatment in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V.Ran2024 to 2025Enrolled70ConditionsAllergic RhinitisArmsDesloratadine / Betamethasone in fixed dose, Desloratadine
NCT07721090 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Pharmacological Management Optimization for Oral Mucosal Disorders: A Clinical Pharmacist Led Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial With Implementation Science Evaluation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of FujairahRan2026 to 2027Enrolled336ConditionsOral Lichen Planus, Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis, Burning Mouth Syndrome, Oral CandidiasisArmsPharmacist-Led Prescribing Optimization and Patient Counselling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pegcetacoplan in idiopathic and familial pediatric C3 glomerulopathy.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Association ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ajay K ShuklaDepartment of Pharmacology, AIIMS Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Ratinder JhajDepartment of Pharmacology, AIIMS Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Saurav MisraDepartment of Pharmacology, AIIMS Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Shah N AhmedDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine and JNM Hospital, Kalyani, West Bengal, India.
Malaya NandaDepartment of Pharmacology, AIIMS Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Deepa ChaudharyDepartment of ADR Monitoring Centre (AMC) AIIMS Bhopal, AIIMS Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Pharmacovigilance Program of India recommends the use of the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) scale, while many clinicians prefer the Naranjo algorithm for its simplicity. In the present study, we assessed agreement between the two widely used causality assessment scales, that is, the WHO-UMC criteria and the Naranjo algorithm. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this study, 842 individual case safety reports were randomly selected from 1000 spontaneously reported forms submitted to the ADR Monitoring Center at a tertiary healthcare Institute in Central India between 2016 and 2018. Two well-trained independent groups performed the causality assessment. One group performed a causality assessment of the 842 ADRs using the WHO-UMC criteria and the other group performed the same using the Naranjo algorithm. The agreement between two ADR causality scales was assessed using the weighted kappa (κ) test.

resultsCohen's kappa coefficient (κ) statistical test was applied between the two scales (WHO-UMC scale and Naranjo algorithm) to find out the agreement between these two scales. "No" agreement was found between the two scales {Kappa statistic with 95% confidence interval = 0.048 (

conclusionThere was no agreement found between the WHO-UMC criteria and the Naranjo algorithm in our study.

Indexed as

Agreement between scalescausality assessmentNaranjo algorithmWHO-UMC scale

Identifiers

PMID34760748
PMCPMC8565125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.