Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34760746›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2021

Impact of alternative strategies to improve the pool of blood donation by off-hour donation: A pilot study and its future prospects.

Babita Raghuwanshi, Ashish Maheshwari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 75% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Babita RaghuwanshiDepartment of Transfusion Medicine and Blood Bank, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Ashish MaheshwariDepartment of Transfusion Medicine and Blood Bank, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe escalating need for blood component due to increasing accidents and surgeries are always challenging for blood banks and hospitals. In this fast and busy world, collecting blood from a healthy and voluntary donor is quite challenging due to time constraints. Many blood donors who wish to donate blood were unable to go to the blood bank because of simultaneous operational timings of the blood bank and office hours of the donors. We dealt with this concern by extending the donation hours and also started collecting blood on the weekends following LAARC (Listen, Acknowledge, Assess, Respond, Confirm) methodology as a pilot project for improving blood donor convenience and satisfaction at the blood bank. METHODOLOGY: It was a prospective observational pilot study conducted at the government tertiary care institute in the Department of Transfusion Medicine from December 2018 to June 2019. All blood donations were made as per the guidelines laid down by the Drug and Cosmetic Act. The donation timings were divided as office-hour donations (8 am to 5 pm on weekdays) and off-hours donations (5 pm to 8 pm, weekends and holidays).

resultsIn this pilot project, over 7 months out of a total of 1,591 donations, 664 donations (41.73%) were done during the off-hours. The donor experiences were pleasing, and they felt extra cared due to the convenient donation timings.

conclusionsIncreasing the donation base needs more donor-friendly timings for the pleasant donation experience without hampering their work. More extensive studies should be conducted to include such strategies for increasing voluntary blood donation.

Indexed as

acknowledgeassessBlood donationconfirm)LAARC (Listenrespond

Identifiers

PMID34760746
PMCPMC8565126
OpenAlexW3203456645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.