ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2021
Basic knowledge among GP trainees regarding HIV pre- and post-exposition-prophylaxis.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPreventing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is central to containing the HIV pandemic. For pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP and PEP), drugs approved in Germany are available. Basic information on this should be obtained from physicians in further training to become specialists in General Practice (GP) since they may have to deal with this topic of high relevance for the health of patients at risk and also the physicians' health after a possible exposure in the professional context. METHODOLOGY: A multiple-choice questionnaire was handed out to doctors in further training in General Practice on seminar days of the Competence Centre for General Practice Saxony-Anhalt for an immediate answer.
resultsOf the 109 doctors, 73 completed the questionnaire. A general high relevance of the topic HIV was stated by 95%. In contrast, 71% said it was relevant for family doctor activities. The knowledge questions on the prevalence were answered correctly for all questions with less than 40%; 21% stated that they knew the indication prerequisite for a PEP; 49% answered the question about the period of the highest efficacy of PEP correctly. PrEP as a drug option for prophylaxis is known to a part of the respondents, 79% would prescribe PrEP, 69% were in favour of a health insurance benefit. DISCUSSION: The results show that the necessary basic knowledge about HIV is partly available. Basic knowledge on structured action in the fields of HIV testing, PEP and PrEP should be taught in a manner appropriate to the relevance of the topic in the context of the German general practice setting. Even a basic knowledge about PEP may help to ensure that the general practice teams receive proper measures after a possible exposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.