Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34760611›Full record

ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2021

Advantage and validation of vendor-independent software for myocardial strain analysis compared to vendor-specific software.

Robert Chamberlain, Kenji Shiino, Gregory M Scalia, Surendran Sabapathy, Jonathan Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Deep learning improves test-retest reproducibility of regional strain in echocardiography.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert ChamberlainDepartment of Cardiology The Prince Charles Hospital Brisbane Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5978-3271
Kenji ShiinoSchool of Medicine and Menzies Health Institute Queensland Griffith University Gold Coast Australia.
Gregory M ScaliaDepartment of Cardiology The Prince Charles Hospital Brisbane Australia.
Surendran SabapathySchool of Medicine and Menzies Health Institute Queensland Griffith University Gold Coast Australia.
Jonathan ChanDepartment of Cardiology The Prince Charles Hospital Brisbane Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOne of the main limitations incorporating strain imaging into widespread clinical practice is inter-vendor incompatibility. This poses a problem when serial strain measurements are required in a multi-vendor echocardiography laboratory.

methodsThis study sought to compare the variability of two-dimensional speckle-tracking global and regional longitudinal strain using vendor-specific software and vendor-independent software from images acquired by two different commercially available ultrasound systems. Forty subjects underwent two sequential echocardiographic acquisitions using different ultrasound systems (GE Vivid E9 and Philips iE33). Global longitudinal strain and regional peak longitudinal strain were derived using vendor-specific software (EchoPAC BT 13 v201 and QLAB version 10.3) and vendor-independent software (TomTec Image Arena version 4.6). Agreement and reproducibility of global and regional strain between vendor-specific and vendor-independent software were assessed by independent blinded observers.

resultsGlobal longitudinal strain derived from vendor-independent software was comparable to global longitudinal strain derived from vendor-specific software, whilst regional strain was lower in agreement compared to global longitudinal strain. There was good overall agreement and high inter- and intra-observer reproducibility using vendor-independent software for global longitudinal strain and regional strain.

conclusionsVendor-independent software provides good agreement with vendor-specific software for global longitudinal strain. However, minor variability exists for regional strain measurements between vendor-independent and vendor-specific software. Good agreement of strain measurements derived by vendor-independent software suggests vendor-independent software could potentially be useful for serial follow-up of global longitudinal strain.

Indexed as

speckle‐trackingstrain imagingvariabilityvendor difference

Identifiers

PMID34760611
PMCPMC8412014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.