Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34760603›Full record

ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2020

Visualisation of focal renal lesions on ultrasound: A review of 518 lesions with contrast CT correlation.

Blanche Wylie, Martin Necas, Aine Heaney

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Blanche WylieDepartment of Radiology Waikato Hospital Hamilton New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3504-4532
Martin NecasDepartment of Radiology Waikato Hospital Hamilton New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8240-601X
Aine HeaneyDepartment of Radiology Waikato Hospital Hamilton New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4471-9351
Waikato Hospital · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConventional ultrasound (US) is a common imaging investigation of the kidneys; however, the current diagnostic performance of US in the visualisation of focal renal lesions is unknown.

methodsThis study was a retrospective sequential review of 518 focal renal lesions (FRLs) in 200 patients aged 50 years or older who received an US of the kidneys followed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT).

resultsPatient's age ranged from 50 to 94 years. The majority were hospital inpatients. 518 FRLs were identified on CECT ranging from 3 to 165 mm (median 8 mm). The majority of FRLs (96.1%) were benign. The visualisation rate of FRLs on US was size-dependent: <5 mm, 10.2%; 5-9 mm, 22.3 mm; 10-14 mm, 48.0%; 15-19 mm, 82.1%; and 20-24 mm, 100%. The visualisation of simple cysts was 49.1% and hyperdense lesions 81.8%. Follow-up was available on 58% of lesions. Benign lesions generally remained stable. Seven patients had concerning heterogeneous hyperdense masses on CECT, and US had visualised six of these (85.7%).

conclusionVisualisation of FRLs is size-dependent. High rate of visualisation is achieved once the lesion exceeds 15 mm in size. Small FRLs are associated with a low rate of visualisation on ultrasound; however, they are rarely concerning. Hyperdense lesions on CECT that carry high suspicion of malignancy are associated with a high rate of US visualisation.

Indexed as

kidneylesionmassrenalultrasound

Identifiers

PMID34760603
PMCPMC8411720
OpenAlexW3096692615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.